| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing | 9% | 2 of 58 | 27% | 48 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Postalytics or Lob are strong starting points if you want CRM-connected marketing automation” Kimi K2 · Direct mail · scale prompt · first choice
“1. Lob - API-First Platform ... Lob - Complete REST API, webhook support, postal IQ routing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct mail · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose PostGrid or Lob if you want API-first, developer-controlled automation” Perplexity Sonar · Direct mail · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Lob as the safest overall choice for print and direct mail marketing.” GPT-5.4 mini · Direct mail · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to Avoid on a Tight Budget- Lob — Great API, but the $260–550/month platform fee” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · budget prompt · hard negative
“SaaS "Subscription Traps" to Avoid on a Budget ... they are not ideal for tight budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct mail · budget prompt · hard negative
“Steep Learning Curve: Complex API documentation and lack of guidance for non-developers” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct mail · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Lob ($260-$550/month) ... their monthly fees are too high for limited budgets.” Kimi K2 · Direct mail · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 154 answers that named Lob and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for Lob, so its own site is not marked.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lob's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lob, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.