GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Click2Mail · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Click2Mail

68Judge labels
7First choices
18Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Direct mail for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 58 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 24 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In direct mail · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Click2Mail for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
PrintMarketing4%6 of 5825%24criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Click2Mail yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Click2Mail across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01012
Grok 4.1 Fast11103
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash02024
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash02103
Kimi K211013
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative18 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels7
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For absolute minimal spend: Start with Click2Mail (no monthly fees) or Stannp ($0-$12/month)” Kimi K2 · Direct mail · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Postalytics or Click2Mail \u2013 both free to sign up” Grok 4.1 Fast · Direct mail · budget prompt · first choice
“or Click2Mail and LetterStream if you primarily need to send one-off mailings without monthly commitments” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct mail · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Growing Businesses - Accessible entry point with strong automation features” Mistral Small · Direct mail · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Broken/misleading delivery tracking... their website is simply not working properly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · negative prompt · hard negative
“Click2Mail if you need deep campaign automation and advanced orchestration, because its automation/multi-touch support is described as limited.” Perplexity Sonar · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative
“Click2Mail are described as having "pay-only-for-what-you-mail" pricing, which may not be suitable for all businesses” Llama 4 Maverick · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative
“10% negative review rate; More basic functionality compared to modern platforms” Kimi K2 · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Click2Mail, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Click2Mail was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Postalytics64 of 6829Not in the top three
Lob55 of 687Not in the top three
Mailjoy44 of 684Not in the top three
PostGrid42 of 684Not in the top three
Stannp39 of 686Not in the top three
Sendoso36 of 680Not in the top three
Reachdesk24 of 680Not in the top three
PFL19 of 680Not in the top three
Postal18 of 680Not in the top three
Postie16 of 680Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Click2Mail. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 68 answers that named Click2Mail and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com6
postalytics.com5
cience.com4
capterra.com3
emailtooltester.com3
gitnux.org3
gundir.com3
sourceforge.net3
thecmo.com3
directmail.io2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Click2Mail came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Click2Mail's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Click2Mail, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at click2mail.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack