GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Postalytics · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Postalytics

155Judge labels
55First choices
21Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
54% in Direct mail for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 58 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
10 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 54 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In direct mail · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Postalytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
PrintMarketing54%1 of 587%54endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Postalytics yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Postalytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512003
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash30115
Perplexity Sonar31004
Grok 4.1 Fast51006
Mistral Small22105
DeepSeek V4 Flash41016
Llama 4 Maverick11103
Qwen 3.7 Flash22004
Kimi K233006
GLM 4.7 FlashX31015
MiniMax M2.521115

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels21
Paraphrase21 labels16
Comparative33 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained28 labels12
Scale-constrained16 labels6
Negative27 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative155 labels in all, every segment counted; 55 of the 70 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Postalytics Free Plan if you want the most robust features with a free tier. It offers the best balance of functionality” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct mail · budget prompt · first choice
“Most mid-market B2B companies will find Postalytics to be the best balance of functionality, ease of use, and integration capabilities” Mistral Small · Direct mail · direct prompt · first choice
“Most mid-market B2B companies find Postalytics the best balance of ease-of-use, marketing integrations, and flexible pricing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct mail · direct prompt · first choice
“Marketing teams wanting automation + measurement → Postalytics (best combination of triggers, tracking, and CRM integrations)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“unlocking their automated CRM triggers ... requires upgrading to paid plans that cost $199 to $499+ per month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct mail · budget prompt · hard negative
“No A/B Testing: Missing this important feature” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct mail · negative prompt · hard negative
“Cumbersome UI: Learning curve for users not in the product daily” MiniMax M2.5 · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative
“No A/B testing, drip campaigns require CRM integration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Postalytics, over the 155 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Postalytics was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Lob129 of 15522Compare →
Sendoso101 of 1554Not in the top three
PostGrid90 of 15510Not in the top three
Click2Mail64 of 1556Not in the top three
Mailjoy52 of 1553Not in the top three
PFL48 of 1554Not in the top three
Reachdesk48 of 1551Not in the top three
Postal33 of 1550Not in the top three
Postie22 of 1550Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Postalytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 155 answers that named Postalytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

postalytics.comYour site21
guideflow.com18
cience.com15
g2.com12
gartner.com12
postgrid.com12
lob.com11
capterra.com10
gitnux.org10
softwareadvice.com10

110 of the 131 domain citations in answers naming Postalytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Postalytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Postalytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at postalytics.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack