Every category where a model named Reachdesk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Print	Marketing	2%	9 of 58	18%	22	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Reachdesk yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Reachdesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels2

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative17 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Reachdesk is widely considered the top choice for mid-market B2B teams looking for high ROI and budget predictability.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct mail · direct prompt · first choice

“Sendoso or Reachdesk if your main use case is account-based marketing, gifting, and sales-led outreach” GPT-5.4 mini · Direct mail · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Choose Sendoso or Reachdesk if your priority is ABM, sales engagement, or gifting plus mail” Perplexity Sonar · Direct mail · comparative prompt · alternative

“Sendoso, Postal, Reachdesk - Combine direct mail with broader sending and gifting motions” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct mail · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High-Ticket Enterprise Gifting & Multi-Channel Platforms (e.g., Sendoso, Reachdesk)... Why to be cautious” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

“Steep learning curve, expensive, US catalog is thin vs. Sendoso” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

“Frequent unannounced changes... Support delays” MiniMax M2.5 · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

“User interface needs cleaning (clunky UX)” Kimi K2 · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Reachdesk, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reachdesk was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lob55 of 5815Not in the top three

Sendoso55 of 584Not in the top three

Postalytics48 of 5815Not in the top three

PostGrid37 of 583Not in the top three

PFL28 of 584Not in the top three

Postal28 of 580Not in the top three

Click2Mail24 of 581Not in the top three

Mailjoy22 of 583Not in the top three

Stannp19 of 584Not in the top three

Postie16 of 580Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reachdesk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 58 answers that named Reachdesk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com6

capterra.com4

gartner.com4

postalytics.com4

postgrid.com4

cience.com3

guideflow.com3

lob.com3

thecmo.com3

businessage.com2

Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Reachdesk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cience.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software3

g2.com/categories/direct-mail-automation3

gartner.com/reviews/market/direct-mail-automation-software3

guideflow.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software3

thecmo.com/tools/best-direct-mail-marketing-software3

businessage.com/post/5-best-direct-mail-automation-software-platforms2

capterra.com/direct-mail-automation-software2

directmailmanager.com/5-critical-mistakes-you-can-avoid-with-direct-mail-automation2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reachdesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reachdesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at reachdesk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.