2 categories · RankedAlyce
72Judge labels
0First choices
31Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Direct mail & gifting for mid-market buyers
Rank 67 of 90 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 42% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Alyce →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business92 of 92
0%17 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market67 of 90
0%26 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise50 of 66
0%23 labels
criticized challenger
In direct mail & gifting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Alyce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct mail and gifting platforms | Marketing | 0% | 67 of 90 | 42% | 26 | criticized challenger | |
| Marketing | 0% | 61 of 68 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Postalytics at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Alyce yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated Alyce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Alyce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labelsNone
Paraphrase11 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative72 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“While it's a solid choice for teams prioritizing 1:1 outreach, it may be less scalable for high-volume or multi-channel campaigns” Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct mail & gifting · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for Personalized 1:1 Gifting: Alyce (now part of Sendoso) focuses on personalized gifting” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct mail & gifting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Alyce differentiates with AI-powered gift recommendations and bias-free selection” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct mail & gifting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Alyce is best for AI-powered personalization, now integrated into Sendoso.” Mistral Small · Direct mail & gifting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Post-acquisition concerns: No warehousing services — all fulfillment is third-party” Kimi K2 · Direct mail & gifting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Alyce | Custom/Enterprise | AI-personalized but pricey” Kimi K2 · Direct mail & gifting · budget prompt · hard negative
“Delivery reliability is the most common complaint on G2 and Capterra... vendor stability (the four-plus layoff round pattern), stacked fee compounding” Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct mail & gifting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Now owned by Sendoso (Feb 2024) — inherits Sendoso's organizational instability” Kimi K2 · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Alyce, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Alyce was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Alyce, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Alyce was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Alyce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 72 answers that named Alyce and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com41
reachdesk.com38
sendoso.com37
docket.io32
ongoody.com31
b2bsaasreviews.com29
improvado.io22
pipeline.zoominfo.com21
guideflow.com20
theabmpulse.com17
288 of the 288 domain citations in answers naming Alyce came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
alyce.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Alyce takes 0% of first choices and Sendoso takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
alyce.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Alyce takes 0% of first choices and Sendoso takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “corporate gifting tool for prospects and customers”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“alyce”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 440 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- · in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,326
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 67 of 90 in direct mail & gifting
Segment leader
25%
Sendoso
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 72 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 72 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Alyce
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Alyce; a claim can dispute any of them.
Alyce by Sendoso 5Sendoso / Alyce by Sendoso 2Alyce (also acquired by Sendoso) 1Sendoso / Alyce by Sendoso / Postal by Sendoso 1
Follow Alyce
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Alyce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Alyce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Alyce by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Alyce is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Alyce, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.