Every category where a model named Mailjoy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Print	Marketing	2%	8 of 58	11%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mailjoy yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mailjoy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative16 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained16 labels2

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want free/cheap testing: Start with Mailjoy or Postalytics free plan” Mistral Small · Direct mail · budget prompt · first choice

“if you are looking for a platform with a simple, self-serve interface, Mailjoy or Click2Mail may be more suitable” Llama 4 Maverick · Direct mail · negative prompt · alternative

“You want simple, self-serve postcards/letters: → Mailjoy or Click2Mail” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct mail · comparative prompt · alternative

“Mailjoy (pay-as-you-go starting at $0.90/postcard) for occasional campaigns” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct mail · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“pricing traps for your size: Mailjoy, Click2Mail, Printfection ... likely lack the governance, API depth, and attribution you need” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · scale prompt · soft negative

“Mailform, Mailjoy, and similar lightweight tools if you need enterprise governance, complex approvals, or robust automation” Perplexity Sonar · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mailjoy, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mailjoy was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Postalytics52 of 5531Not in the top three

Click2Mail44 of 556Not in the top three

Lob44 of 556Not in the top three

Stannp39 of 558Not in the top three

PostGrid28 of 552Not in the top three

Sendoso27 of 550Not in the top three

Reachdesk22 of 550Not in the top three

Postal18 of 550Not in the top three

Postie15 of 551Not in the top three

PFL15 of 550Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mailjoy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 55 answers that named Mailjoy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com6

cience.com4

postalytics.com4

thecmo.com4

capterra.com3

emailtooltester.com3

gartner.com3

gitnux.org3

businessage.com2

directmail.io2

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Mailjoy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software6

cience.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software4

thecmo.com/tools/best-direct-mail-marketing-software4

capterra.com/direct-mail-automation-software3

emailtooltester.com/en/blog/email-automation-software3

gartner.com/reviews/market/direct-mail-automation-software3

gitnux.org/best/direct-mail-automation-software3

postalytics.com/3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mailjoy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mailjoy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mailjoy.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.