GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Printfection · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Printfection

10Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Printfection was named 5 times in Direct mail, where Postalytics led with 54%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business35 of 57

under the label threshold

Mid-market32 of 58

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In direct mail · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Printfection for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Print	Marketing	0%	32 of 58	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Postalytics at 54%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Printfection yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Printfection across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“pricing traps for your size: Mailjoy, Click2Mail, Printfection” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Printfection, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Printfection was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Postalytics10 of 106Not in the top three

Mailjoy10 of 101Not in the top three

Click2Mail10 of 100Not in the top three

Lob9 of 103Not in the top three

PostGrid8 of 101Not in the top three

Stannp7 of 101Not in the top three

Postal7 of 100Not in the top three

Postie7 of 100Not in the top three

Sendoso7 of 100Not in the top three

Reachdesk6 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Printfection. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 10 answers that named Printfection and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cience.com2

guideflow.com2

worldmetrics.org2

brevo.com1

capterra.com1

directmail.io1

f6s.com1

fitsmallbusiness.com1

gartner.com1

gitnux.org1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Printfection came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cience.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software2

guideflow.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software2

brevo.com/blog/cheap-email-marketing1

capterra.com/direct-mail-automation-software1

directmail.io/best-direct-mail-software1

directmail.io/best/direct-mail-platforms-20261

f6s.com/software/category/direct-mail-automation1

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-direct-mail-service1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Printfection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Printfection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at printfection.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.