Every category where a model named PostcardMania for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Print	Marketing	0%	57 of 58	80%	5	under 10 labels · led by Postalytics at 54%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PostcardMania yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PostcardMania across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options include PostcardMania and Modern Postcard for postcard-based campaigns.” Llama 4 Maverick · Direct mail · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“PostcardMania, Direct Mail Processing LLC, and Distribution Processing Center show consistent patterns of poor customer experiences and should be avoided.” Mistral Small · Direct mail · negative prompt · hard negative

“PostcardMania — Low per-piece price, but requires a 5,000-piece minimum plus $199–499 setup fees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid platforms like PostcardMania for small budgets.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct mail · budget prompt · hard negative

“PostcardMania if your program needs letters, catalogs, or multi-piece mail, because postcard-centric platforms may not fit broader mail formats.” Perplexity Sonar · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PostcardMania, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PostcardMania was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Postalytics14 of 183Not in the top three

Lob12 of 182Not in the top three

Click2Mail9 of 180Not in the top three

PostGrid8 of 182Not in the top three

REmail5 of 182Not in the top three

Mailjoy5 of 181Not in the top three

Sendoso4 of 181Not in the top three

Modern Postcard4 of 180Not in the top three

GundirXpress3 of 182Not in the top three

Stannp3 of 181Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PostcardMania. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 18 answers that named PostcardMania and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com5

cience.com4

gartner.com4

postalytics.com4

gitnux.org3

gundir.com3

oppizi.com3

postgrid.com3

softwareadvice.com3

wifitalents.com3

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming PostcardMania came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software5

cience.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software4

gartner.com/reviews/market/direct-mail-automation-software4

gundir.com/resource/best-direct-mail-companies3

oppizi.com/us/en/resources/blog/direct-mail/best-direct-mail-companies3

softwareadvice.com/category/4762-direct-mail-automation3

businessage.com/post/5-best-direct-mail-automation-software-platforms2

capterra.com/direct-mail-automation-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PostcardMania's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PostcardMania, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at postcardmania.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.