AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Dailymotion · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Dailymotion

6Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Dailymotion was named 4 times in Video hosting, where Wistia led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In video hosting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Dailymotion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Video marketing and hostingMarketing0%44 of 47100%4under 10 labels · led by Wistia at 51%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Dailymotion held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Video hosting · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 52 → 40 of 43
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 → 39 of 45

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Video hosting0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 52 → 44 of 47

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Dailymotion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Free "Unlimited" Platforms (Dailymotion, Rumble, etc.) These platforms can be problematic for professional marketing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video hosting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Obscure, "Free" Third-Party Sites (e.g., Dailymotion, Streamable) ... The Verdict: Avoid.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video hosting · negative prompt · hard negative
“These are audience-reach tools, not brand-safe marketing infrastructure.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Video hosting · negative prompt · hard negative
“significantly lower reach and tighter upload limits, making it a less suitable choice for professional or large-scale video strategies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Video hosting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dailymotion, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dailymotion was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wistia6 of 62Not among the top eight
Vimeo6 of 60Not among the top eight
YouTube6 of 60Not among the top eight
Vidyard4 of 62Not among the top eight
Google Drive4 of 60Not among the top eight
SproutVideo4 of 60Not among the top eight
AWS S33 of 60Not among the top eight
Brightcove3 of 60Not among the top eight
Dropbox3 of 60Not among the top eight
TikTok3 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dailymotion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Dailymotion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

swarmify.com6
guideflow.com4
gumlet.com3
movingimage.com3
alugha.com2
apollotechnical.com2
corp.kaltura.com2
devopsschool.com2
fast.io2
ignite.video2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Dailymotion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on dailymotion.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
9,789
counted in the table below
Documentation
202
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Podcast or video9,783undated
Webinar or virtual event6undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page dailymotion.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Dailymotion

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Dailymotion.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Paris, France
Founded
2005
Ownership
Part of Vivendi

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dailymotion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dailymotion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dailymotion by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Dailymotion is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dailymotion, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dailymotion.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.