Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 15 of 48
3 categories · Named, not rankedCopper
15Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Copper was named 5 times in CRM and 2 other categories, where HubSpot CRM led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 51
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 64
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise63 of 70
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Copper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Revenue operations | 0% | 17 of 64 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 59% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 0% | 21 of 49 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 34 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Copper held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CRM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 15 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 → 59 of 66
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 17 of 64 |
| Customer success | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 21 of 49, unchanged |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Copper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Copper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Google Workspace‑centric teams | Copper | Native Gmail/Calendar integration” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“a solid choice for smaller teams or those already using Google Workspace” Mistral Small · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your team refuses to leave Gmail, Copper is often the best choice” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Copper (simpler, CRM-native)” Mistral Small · Customer success · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Copper, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Copper was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Copper, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Copper was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Copper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 15 answers that named Copper and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com3
forbes.com3
g2.com3
albato.com2
bardeen.ai2
marketwatch.com2
pipedrive.com2
pipeline.zoominfo.com2
reddit.com2
superagi.com2
Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Copper came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on copper.com
1,051
subdomains included
Content
766
counted in the table below
Documentation
87
Product · Integration
0 · 137
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 635 | undated | CRM, Enrichment | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 59 | undated | CRM | ||
| Comparison | 30 | undated | CRM, CDP | ||
| Case study | 23 | undated | CRM | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | undated | CRM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | undated | ABM | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page copper.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Copper
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Copper is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Copper is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- CRM Software Solutions Company for Service Businesses
- For
- service businesses
- Price stated
- Basic $23, Professional $59, Business $99 per user per month copper.com
- Starting price
- 23 copper.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial copper.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5000 copper.com/pricing
- Certifications
- TRUSTe Data Privacy Framework VerificationCPRA (formerly CCPA)GDPREU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU-U.S. DPF)UK Extension to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy FrameworkSwiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (Swiss-U.S. DPF)Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA)Colorado Privacy Act (ColoPA)
- Customers named
- OrderologySilicon FoundryExit DesignPolymathTimmy.ioID360Aux ModeUniVicoustic
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Copper's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: copper.com, copper.com/pricing, trust.copper.com, copper.com/case-studies, copper.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Copper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Copper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Copper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Copper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Copper, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.