Every category where a model named Convert for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Experimentation and personalization	Marketing	8%	3 of 69	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Convert yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Convert across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase12 labels4

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained7 labels2

Negative9 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative53 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I would recommend Convert.com if you want a strong balance of reliability, privacy, and straightforward pricing” Perplexity Sonar · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I would recommend Convert.com as the best A/B testing and personalization tool for a mid-sized B2B company” Llama 4 Maverick · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Privacy-first (excellent GDPR), affordable (~$299+/month), up to 50 goals/test.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Experimentation · negative prompt · first choice

“## Top Recommendation: Convert.com” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Convert, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Convert was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

VWO46 of 5317Compare →

Optimizely CMS41 of 537Not in the top three

AB Tasty30 of 530Not in the top three

Adobe Target28 of 531Not in the top three

GrowthBook25 of 533Not in the top three

Statsig23 of 532Not in the top three

Dynamic Yield21 of 530Not in the top three

Kameleoon19 of 533Not in the top three

Mutiny18 of 531Not in the top three

PostHog15 of 534Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Convert. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 53 answers that named Convert and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

vwo.com4

convert.comYour site3

gartner.com3

qualaroo.com3

abmatic.ai2

convertize.com2

cxl.com2

growthmethod.com2

learn.g2.com2

mida.so2

Twenty-two of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Convert came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

convert.com/blog/a-b-testing/ab-testing-tools-for-growth-teams3

gartner.com/reviews/market/a-b-testing-tools3

qualaroo.com/blog/best-ab-testing-tools3

convert.com/blog/a-b-testing/top-ab-testing-tools2

convertize.com/ab-testing-tools2

cxl.com/blog/ab-testing-tools2

growthmethod.com/best-ab-testing-tools2

learn.g2.com/best-a-b-testing-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Convert

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Convert; a claim can dispute any of them.

Convert.com 10

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Convert's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Convert, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at convert.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.