GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Consently · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Consently

10Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Consently was named 3 times in Consent, where Enzuzo led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 38

under the label threshold

Mid-market36 of 39

under the label threshold

Enterprise37 of 40

under the label threshold

In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Consently for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	36 of 39	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Enzuzo at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Consently yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Consently across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Consently is explicitly described as not a fit for enterprise governance and as better suited to SMBs or agencies.[7]” Perplexity Sonar · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Consently, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Consently was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneTrust8 of 104Not in the top three

TrustArc8 of 100Not in the top three

Ketch7 of 103Not in the top three

Cookiebot7 of 101Not in the top three

Osano7 of 100Not in the top three

Usercentrics7 of 100Not in the top three

Didomi6 of 100Not in the top three

CookieYes5 of 101Not in the top three

Enzuzo3 of 101Not in the top three

Complianz3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Consently. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 10 answers that named Consently and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

consently.netYour site2

ethyca.com2

expertinsights.com2

reddit.com2

reflectiz.com2

secureprivacy.ai2

usercentrics.com2

adage.com1

bestdevops.com1

blueconic.com1

Fifteen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Consently came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

consently.net/blog/best-cmp-for-enterprise2

ethyca.com/news/top-consent-management-platforms-for-compliance2

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-consent-management-solutions2

reflectiz.com/blog/top-seven-consent-management-platforms-20262

secureprivacy.ai/blog/best-cmp-20262

usercentrics.com/knowledge-hub/consent-management-platforms2

adage.com/career-development/ad-age-encyclopedia/aa-consent-management-platforms-in-advert1

bestdevops.com/top-10-consent-management-platforms-cmp-features-pros-cons-and-comparison1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Consently

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Consently; a claim can dispute any of them.

Secure Privacy / Consently 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Consently's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Consently, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at consently.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.