Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 23 of 36
1 category · Named, not rankedUsercentrics
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Usercentrics was named 1 time in Tag management, where Google Tag Manager led with 81%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business24 of 37
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market52 of 67
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In tag management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Usercentrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 52 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Google Tag Manager at 81% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Usercentrics held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Tag management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 42 of 56
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 52 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Usercentrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Usercentrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Usercentrics, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Usercentrics was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Usercentrics, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Usercentrics was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Usercentrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Usercentrics and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
observepoint.com2
usercentrics.comYour site2
firstsales.io1
g2.com1
gartner.com1
guideflow.com1
inboundlogistics.com1
marketingscoop.com1
martech.org1
omr.com1
Ten of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Usercentrics came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
usercentrics.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Usercentrics takes 0% of first choices and Google Tag Manager takes 81%.ShowHide
Search and answers
usercentrics.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Usercentrics takes 0% of first choices and Google Tag Manager takes 81%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “tag management system”
7
Position for “best tag management system”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“usercentrics”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 33 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 67,472 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,627 · 678 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 60,562
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $494 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 52 of 67 in tag management
Segment leader
81%
Google Tag Manager
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on usercentrics.com
2,267
subdomains included
Content
535
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 11
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 150 | 0 | 2025-11-10 | Tag management, Mobile apps | |
| Blog | 124 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | Consent, SEO | |
| News or press | 72 | 2 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Conference or event | 65 | 0 | 2025-10-10 | Mobile apps | |
| Template or tool | 44 | 3 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Case study | 37 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Comparison | 22 | 0 | 2026-02-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 0 | 2025-03-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Resigned consent blog
- 2026-09-15What is a cmp glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-27Usercentrics cookiebot g2 leader status fall 2026 news or press
- 2026-08-24Ndpa checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-07App ad revenue consent calculator template or tool
- 2026-08-04New work web app consent management blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page usercentrics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Usercentrics
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Usercentrics is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Usercentrics is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Consent Management Platform (CMP)
- For
- your growing business
- Price stated
- Explore our pricing plans and find one that matches your business size and needs. usercentrics.com
- Starting price
- 0 usercentrics.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start free usercentrics.com
- Integrations claimed
- 16 usercentrics.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2 CompliantHIPAA CompliantProficertISO 27001 CertifiedWCAG 2.2 AA Accessibility CertifiedIAB TCF v2.3 Certified CMPGoogle Certified CMPWCAG 2.1 AA Accessibility Certified
- Hosting
- Data center based in Germany
- Customers named
- Gilson Inc.ONEAMBOSSVilleroy & BochNEW WORK SEXINGShorePaul & Shark
What Usercentrics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: usercentrics.com, usercentrics.com/pricing, trust.usercentrics.com, usercentrics.com/customer-stories, usercentrics.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Usercentrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Usercentrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Usercentrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Usercentrics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Usercentrics, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.