GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Axeptio · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Axeptio

14Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Axeptio was named 5 times in Consent, where Enzuzo led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 38

under the label threshold

Mid-market17 of 39

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Axeptio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Consent and privacy management	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	17 of 39	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Enzuzo at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Axeptio yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Axeptio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“score better on privacy and user experience include ... Axeptio” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some lower-cost options, such as CookieYes and Axeptio, are positioned as better when *governance breadth isn't a requirement*.[3]” Perplexity Sonar · Consent · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Axeptio, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Axeptio was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CookieYes13 of 147Not in the top three

Cookiebot11 of 141Not in the top three

Osano10 of 140Not in the top three

OneTrust9 of 141Not in the top three

Enzuzo8 of 140Not in the top three

Termly7 of 141Not in the top three

Didomi6 of 140Not in the top three

consentmanager6 of 140Not in the top three

iubenda6 of 140Not in the top three

CookieScript5 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Axeptio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 14 answers that named Axeptio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ethyca.com3

enzuzo.com2

expertinsights.com2

secureprivacy.ai2

usercentrics.com2

adage.com1

bestdevops.com1

blueconic.com1

consentik.com1

consently.net1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Axeptio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ethyca.com/news/top-consent-management-platforms-for-compliance3

enzuzo.com/blog/best-consent-management-platforms2

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-consent-management-solutions2

usercentrics.com/knowledge-hub/consent-management-platforms2

adage.com/career-development/ad-age-encyclopedia/aa-consent-management-platforms-in-advert1

bestdevops.com/top-10-consent-management-platforms-cmp-features-pros-cons-and-comparison1

blueconic.com/resources/consent-management-platforms1

consentik.com/best-consent-management-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Axeptio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Axeptio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at axeptio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.