AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Amplemarket · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Amplemarket

38Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Sales engagement for mid-market buyers
Rank 15 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sales engagement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Amplemarket for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Sales engagement platformsSales0%15 of 660%8under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Data enrichmentGTM data and infrastructure0%15 of 500%3under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73%▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Email deliverability and testing toolsMarketing0%38 of 1100%3under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34%
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%77 of 1240%1under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Sales intelligence and contact dataSales0%22 of 520%1under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Amplemarket held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Sales engagement · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 21 of 48
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 14 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 of 45, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Enrichment7%0%▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 3 → 15 of 50
Sales engagement0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 15 of 66
Email deliverability0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 38 of 110, unchanged
Channel marketing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 77 of 124, unchanged
Sales intel0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 9 → 22 of 52

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Amplemarket across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502204
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options include Amplemarket, which bundles B2B data, multichannel engagement, and Duo, its AI agent, into one mid-market platform.” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales engagement · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for mid-market teams wanting data and engagement combined without enterprise procurement” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales engagement · direct prompt · alternative
“or Amplemarket if you have a larger budget and need higher-end deliverability features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales engagement · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: Forward-thinking teams looking for AI-first, signal-based outbound.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales engagement · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Amplemarket, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amplemarket was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apollo.io21 of 386Not among the top eight
ZoomInfo14 of 385Not among the top eight
Cognism13 of 383Not among the top eight
Lusha10 of 381Not among the top eight
Clay9 of 381Not among the top eight
Salesloft9 of 381Not among the top eight
Outreach8 of 382Not among the top eight
6sense7 of 380Not among the top eight
GlockApps6 of 381Not among the top eight
HubSpot Sales Hub6 of 381Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amplemarket. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named Amplemarket and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

amplemarket.comYour site31
pipeline.zoominfo.com12
demandbase.com11
prospeo.io9
saleshandy.com9
salesmotion.io8
apollo.io7
avoma.com7
resources.rework.com7
syncgtm.com7

Seventy-seven of the 108 domain citations in answers naming Amplemarket came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

amplemarket.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Amplemarket takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“amplemarket”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
8 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 12,067 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,210 · 148 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,236
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
10 ads · 10 text · 8 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as Tagis, Inc., verified. 3 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 66 in sales engagement
Segment leader
35%
Apollo.io
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
38 answers
Its own site cited
in 38 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on amplemarket.com
1,205
subdomains included
Content
834
counted in the table below
Documentation
56
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog402252026-09-18
Glossary or explainer31412026-09-17
Case study4412026-07-31
Comparison3112026-07-31
Webinar or virtual event1602025-11-04
Report or ebook1502025-05-01
Conference or event702025-11-04
Template or tool2undated
Podcast or video202024-06-10
News or press102025-11-04
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page amplemarket.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Amplemarket

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Amplemarket.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
United States

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Sales Copilot for sales teams
For
B2B sales teams
Price stated
Free trial available amplemarket.com
Starting price
600 amplemarket.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free trial available amplemarket.com
Integrations claimed
28 amplemarket.com/integrations
Certifications
5 stars G2 reviewscapterra-stars-whiteGenerative AI Cool Vendor bySAML 2.0
Customers named
DeelCabifyStorylakeMultiplierTurnBouncerCentageClara
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Amplemarket's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: amplemarket.com, amplemarket.com/pricing, trust.amplemarket.com, amplemarket.com/customers, amplemarket.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amplemarket's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amplemarket, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Amplemarket by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Amplemarket is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Amplemarket, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at amplemarket.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.