GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Albacross · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Albacross

14Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Albacross was named 6 times in Session replay and 1 other category, where Microsoft Clarity led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market13 of 56

under the label threshold

Enterprise21 of 50

under the label threshold

In session replay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Albacross for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Session replay and heatmaps	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	13 of 56	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33%
Identity resolution	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	51 of 140	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Albacross yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Albacross across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase12 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Knock Reveal, Factors.ai, or Albacross are the best choices due to their B2B focus” Mistral Small · Session replay · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For EU-heavy traffic, Leadinfo or Albacross are better, GDPR-compliant alternatives.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Session replay · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Albacross if you want anonymous web visitor identification” Perplexity Sonar · Identity · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Alternative: Albacross ... A cost-effective alternative” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Session replay · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Albacross, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Albacross was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hotjar6 of 142Not among the top eight

RB2B6 of 141Not among the top eight

Dealfront5 of 141Not among the top eight

Google Analytics 45 of 141Not among the top eight

Factors.ai4 of 141Not among the top eight

Microsoft Clarity4 of 141Not among the top eight

Leadinfo4 of 140Not among the top eight

Warmly4 of 140Not among the top eight

6sense3 of 140Not among the top eight

Demandbase3 of 140Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Albacross. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Albacross and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

knock-ai.com7

pipeline.zoominfo.com7

rb2b.com6

factors.ai5

salespanel.io5

coffee.ai4

cometly.com4

socialintents.com4

improvado.io3

leadfeeder.com3

Forty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Albacross came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

knock-ai.com/blog/best-b2b-website-visitor-identification-software-and-tools7

pipeline.zoominfo.com/marketing/website-visitor-tracking-tools6

rb2b.com/learn/website-visitor-tracking-software5

cometly.com/post/best-visitor-tracking-software-20264

socialintents.com/blog/website-visitor-tracking-tools4

coffee.ai/articles/website-visitor-analytics-tools-20263

factors.ai/blog/free-website-traffic-analysis-tools3

factors.ai/blog/visitor-identification-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on albacross.com

238

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
News or press	70	0	2018-09-07
Case study	13	undated
Comparison	4	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	0	2025-05-05
Template or tool	1	0	2025-10-01

Most recent

2025-10-011933616 gdpr compliance checklist template or tool
2025-05-0510146587 creating auto engage campaigns glossary or explainer
2018-09-07How to build a b2b brand on social media news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page albacross.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Albacross

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Albacross is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Engage leads visiting your website with personalized automated outreach. Identify companies, segment by buying intent, and auto-engage ready-to-buy prospects.
albacross.com
For: Sales/Marketing Teams
albacross.com
Price stated: €59/month albacross.com/pricing
Starting price: €59 albacross.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free 14-day Access. No credit card needed. albacross.com
Integrations claimed: 30 albacross.com
Certifications: Fully GDPR & CCPA CompliantGDPR & CCPA CompliantGDPR COMPLIANT
Customers named: AlpegaOmronPayFitSpendeskEpidemic SoundBrevoKonica Minolta
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What Albacross's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: albacross.com, albacross.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Albacross's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Albacross, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Albacross by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Albacross is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Albacross, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.