AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Adobe Creative Cloud · October 2026 Edition
Adobe · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Adobe Creative Cloud

7Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Adobe Creative Cloud was named 5 times in Creative automation, where Bannerflow led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In creative automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adobe Creative Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Creative automation platformsMarketing0%40 of 10940%5under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adobe Creative Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adobe Creative Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The industry standard for professional creatives. It combines the full suite of apps (Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign) with Adobe's generative AI, Firefly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Creative automation · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need professional-grade design tools with some automation, Adobe is best.” Mistral Small · Creative automation · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Long history of billing complaints - Subscription complexity issues” Kimi K2 · Creative automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“professional quality but higher cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Creative automation · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adobe Creative Cloud, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Creative Cloud was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Canva4 of 70Not among the top eight
Bannerflow3 of 70Not among the top eight
Figma3 of 70Not among the top eight
Celtra2 of 71Not among the top eight
Adobe Express2 of 70Not among the top eight
Bynder2 of 70Not among the top eight
Canva for Enterprise2 of 70Not among the top eight
Hunch2 of 70Not among the top eight
Smartly2 of 70Not among the top eight
HubSpot Content Hub1 of 71Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Creative Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named Adobe Creative Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bannerflow.com3
dataintelo.com3
tryatria.com3
cflowapps.com2
optiow.com2
tryholo.ai2
webrand.com2
ziflow.com2
abyssale.com1
adflow.jp1

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Adobe Creative Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Adobe Creative Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adobe Creative Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
Adobe Creative Cloud + Firefly 2Adobe Creative Cloud + Firefly AI 1

Follow Adobe Creative Cloud

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Adobe is the company behind Adobe Creative Cloud.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
adobe.com
Headquarters
San Jose, United States
Founded
1982
Employees
about 25,988 (2021)
Ownership
Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Creative Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Creative Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Creative Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Adobe Creative Cloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe Creative Cloud, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adobe.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.