Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 → 48 of 65
4 categories · RankedActionIQ
60Judge labels
2First choices
15Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in CDP for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ActionIQ →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business66 of 78
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 61
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 52
2%20 labels
criticized challenger
In cdp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ActionIQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer data platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 18 of 61 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 154 of 159 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 40 of 142 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 76 of 140 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ActionIQ held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CDP · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 17 of 57
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 11 of 49
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDP | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 18 of 61 |
| DMP | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 154 of 159 |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 122 → 40 of 142 |
| Identity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 140, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ActionIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ActionIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative18 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If enterprise governance and role‑based controls are critical, ActionIQ's governance‑first architecture is a strong candidate.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CDP · comparative prompt · alternative
“ActionIQ — best if your team is more enterprise-leaning and needs stronger segmentation/marketing operations” GPT-5.4 mini · Customer intel · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: Enterprises that want a warehouse-native architecture but need a visual, no-code UI” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CDP · comparative prompt · alternative
“For real-time activation and governance, Tealium or ActionIQ are strong.” Mistral Small · CDP · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“enterprise-focused, with pricing and complexity that typically don't fit mid-market budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DMP · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Limited Budgets ... ActionIQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CDP · budget prompt · hard negative
“without ActionIQ's enterprise price tag” Muse Glimmer 30B · CDP · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ActionIQ, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ActionIQ was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ActionIQ, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ActionIQ was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ActionIQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 60 answers that named ActionIQ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cdp.com40
improvado.io27
cxtoday.com20
resources.rework.com19
brevo.com17
gartner.com17
g2.com15
elogic.co14
nvecta.com13
salesforce.com13
195 of the 195 domain citations in answers naming ActionIQ came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
uniphore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ActionIQ takes 0% of first choices and Segment takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
uniphore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ActionIQ takes 0% of first choices and Segment takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer data platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer data platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“actioniq”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 11 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,916 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,472 · 54 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,921
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 61 in CDP
Segment leader
49%
Segment
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 60 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 58 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on uniphore.com
461
subdomains included
Content
332
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
32 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 120 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | CDP, Enrichment | |
| Blog | 85 | 15 | 2026-10-01 | CDP, AI marketing agents | |
| Report or ebook | 36 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | CDP | |
| News or press | 29 | 2 | 2026-08-27 | CDP | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | 3 | 2026-10-02 | CDP | |
| Case study | 24 | 0 | 2026-04-15 | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | 1 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2026-05-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-02The future of customer intelligence moving beyond segments to ai powered marketing webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-01Transforming the workflow into a learning engine blog
- 2026-09-24Digital twin of a customer glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-21The real reason ai doesnt scale blog
- 2026-09-21Redefining Enterprise Intelligence with Autonomous AI report or ebook
- 2026-09-21Redefining enterprise intelligence with autonomous ai report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page uniphore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as ActionIQ
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ActionIQ; a claim can dispute any of them.
ActionIQ (now Uniphore CDP Agent) 1
Follow ActionIQ
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ActionIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ActionIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ActionIQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ActionIQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ActionIQ, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.