Scrunch vs SE Ranking
One of twelve models named Scrunch first on the direct prompt; zero named SE Ranking. Scrunch was named by nine of the twelve models and SE Ranking by nine and Scrunch carries 21 labels and SE Ranking 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
United States, founded 2012. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.
By framing
ScrunchFirst choices, of twelve modelsSE Ranking
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Scrunch SE Ranking first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Scrunch on the left and SE Ranking on the right.The direct prompt
Scrunch first, SE Ranking not the choice
1 of 12 modelsSE Ranking was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
SE Ranking2%#– of 9Scrunch0%#– of 9Scrunch8%#5 of 11SE Ranking6%#6 of 11Scrunch2%#3 of 9SE Ranking2%#– of 9What the models said about Scrunch
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Profound ($499+/month) or Scrunch AI ($250/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Profound or Scrunch AI. Both provide deep developer APIs, agent analytics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“it is recommended to look at tools such as Profound, Scrunch, and AthenaHQ” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · first choice
“I recommend Scrunch as the primary choice for pure-play AI visibility” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about SE Ranking
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“they should be treated with caution as your primary AI visibility solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with SE Ranking if you want: - A balance of affordability and depth” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best overall for a mid-sized B2B company: SE Ranking” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.