GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › ZINFI UPM · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ZINFI UPM

6Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ZINFI UPM was named 2 times in PRM, where Channeltivity led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business31 of 60

under the label threshold

Mid-market45 of 50

under the label threshold

Enterprise19 of 54

under the label threshold

In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ZINFI UPM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	45 of 50	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ZINFI UPM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ZINFI UPM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“strong if you want broad end-to-end channel management and very high review scores on G2” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Complex, lengthy implementations: Weeks to months of configuration required” Kimi K2 · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZINFI UPM, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZINFI UPM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PartnerStack5 of 60Not in the top three

Salesforce PRM4 of 61Not in the top three

Kiflo4 of 60Not in the top three

Impartner PRM3 of 61Not in the top three

Channeltivity3 of 60Not in the top three

impact.com3 of 60Not in the top three

Introw2 of 61Not in the top three

Impartner1 of 61Not in the top three

PartnerPortal.io1 of 61Not in the top three

Unifyr1 of 61Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZINFI UPM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 6 answers that named ZINFI UPM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com1

learn.g2.com1

Two of the two domain citations in answers naming ZINFI UPM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/partner-ecosystem-platforms/themes/partner-relationship-management1

g2.com/products/impartner-prm/reviews1

learn.g2.com/best-prm-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZINFI UPM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZINFI UPM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zinfi.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.