GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Kiflo · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Kiflo

123Judge labels
23First choices
8Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
35% in PRM for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 50 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 38 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kiflo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Partner relationship managementPartner and channel2%7 of 505%38accepted challenger
Referral and partner programsPartner and channel2%14 of 1070%3under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%25 of 1080%5under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kiflo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kiflo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501203
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash13105
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast13105
Mistral Small03205
DeepSeek V4 Flash06006
Llama 4 Maverick00303
Qwen 3.7 Flash03014
Kimi K214005
GLM 4.7 FlashX03104
MiniMax M2.503104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels3
Paraphrase29 labels12
Comparative21 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels4
Scale-constrained9 labels4
Negative22 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative123 labels in all, every segment counted; 23 of the 33 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Kiflo is highly recommended... Best suited for: Mid-sized B2B companies with complex sales cycles” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Safer bets (high ratings, fewer complaints): Kiflo, Introw, Partnerplace” Grok 4.1 Fast · PRM · negative prompt · first choice
“Kiflo — Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B” Kimi K2 · PRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“SMBs needing automation, account mapping, multi-channel ... | Higher entry; caps partners on base plan.” Grok 4.1 Fast · PRM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“reviews have specifically flagged certain niche platforms (such as Kiflo) for usability issues on mobile devices and limited customer support teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Kiflo / Magentrix / PartnerStack — worth evaluating only if you need more complete partner-program features and can handle a higher spend” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kiflo, over the 123 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kiflo was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PartnerStack84 of 1236Not in the top three
PartnerPortal.io75 of 12330Not in the top three
Impartner62 of 1235Not in the top three
Salesforce PRM56 of 1231Not in the top three
Channeltivity49 of 1238Not in the top three
Channelscaler46 of 1231Not in the top three
JourneyBee43 of 1238Not in the top three
ZINFI37 of 1231Not in the top three
Unifyr35 of 1233Not in the top three
impact.com27 of 1231Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kiflo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 123 answers that named Kiflo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com7
learn.g2.com7
partnerportal.io7
journeybee.io6
monday.com6
channelinsider.com5
guideflow.com5
gartner.com4
partnerplace.io4
kiflo.comYour site3

Fifty-one of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Kiflo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kiflo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kiflo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kiflo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.