Every category where a model named ZINFI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	4%	8 of 108	25%	20	criticized challenger
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	2%	12 of 50	33%	18	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ZINFI yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ZINFI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	1	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	4	6
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	3	2	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	2	1	3
Kimi K2	1	3	0	2	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct29 labels6

Paraphrase14 labels1

Comparative21 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained17 labels3

Scale-constrained15 labels2

Negative25 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative121 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Recognized as the top-rated enterprise PRM platform on G2 (Summer 2026 Leader), suitable for mid-market to enterprise B2B companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PRM · direct prompt · first choice

“ZINFI is the top-rated enterprise PRM platform on G2 (Summer 2026 Leader), recognized for its Unified Partner Management approach” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PRM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Allbound or ZINFI likely offer the best balance of capability and cost” Kimi K2 · Channel marketing · scale prompt · first choice

“Need partner marketing | ZINFI (modular pricing)” MiniMax M2.5 · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“enterprise-heavy tools like Impartner/ZINFI (~$20k+/yr) are overkill for mid-sized” Grok 4.1 Fast · PRM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Allbound / ZINFI — Solid but often priced at enterprise levels” Kimi K2 · PRM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“ZINFI if you need modern UX or HubSpot-native integration” Kimi K2 · Channel marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Enterprise Tools (like Impartner or ZINFI) initially” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PRM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZINFI, over the 121 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZINFI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Impartner97 of 12121Not in the top three

Channelscaler65 of 1216Not in the top three

Unifyr61 of 1216Not in the top three

Salesforce PRM57 of 1211Not in the top three

PartnerStack44 of 1213Not in the top three

Channeltivity43 of 1217Not in the top three

JourneyBee40 of 1217Not in the top three

Kiflo37 of 12111Not in the top three

Mindmatrix33 of 1210Not in the top three

PartnerPortal.io28 of 12111Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZINFI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 121 answers that named ZINFI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com14

monday.com14

zinfi.comYour site13

partnerportal.io12

guideflow.com11

gartner.com9

introw.io9

journeybee.io9

learn.g2.com8

partnerplace.io8

Ninety-four of the 107 domain citations in answers naming ZINFI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/prm-software13

guideflow.com/blog/best-prm-software11

zinfi.com/blog/partner-relationship-management-software-20269

learn.g2.com/best-prm-software8

partnerplace.io/knowledge-base/what-are-the-best-prm-software-solutions-out-there-20268

partnerportal.io/partner-relationship-management-platforms8

gartner.com/reviews/market/partner-relationship-management-applications7

introw.io/blog/best-partner-relationship-management-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ZINFI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZINFI; a claim can dispute any of them.

Zinfi 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZINFI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZINFI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zinfi.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.