GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Whop · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Whop

12Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Whop was named 2 times in Billing and 1 other category, where Chargebee led with 60%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 72

under the label threshold

Mid-market38 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise59 of 59

under the label threshold

In billing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Whop for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Billing and subscription management	Revenue operations	0%	38 of 54	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Chargebee at 60%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Community platforms	Customer	0%	40 of 75	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Bettermode at 29%

Movement

Since September 2026, Whop held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Billing · by segment

Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 4% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 15 of 66

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 29 → 35 of 51

EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 58 of 58, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Billing	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 29 → 38 of 54
Community	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 40 of 75, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Whop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Discord/Whop/Facebook Groups are the practical free starters” Muse Glimmer 30B · Community · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Whop, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Whop was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe Billing10 of 127Not among the top eight

Chargebee8 of 122Not among the top eight

Paddle8 of 121Not among the top eight

Recurly6 of 120Not among the top eight

Zuora6 of 120Not among the top eight

Maxio4 of 121Not among the top eight

Lemon Squeezy3 of 120Not among the top eight

Zoho Billing3 of 120Not among the top eight

Circle2 of 121Not among the top eight

Discord2 of 120Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Whop. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Whop and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

whop.comYour site11

zoneandco.com9

ecommerce-platforms.com5

learn.g2.com5

resources.rework.com5

g2.com4

kreante.co4

unibee.dev4

viasocket.com4

baremetrics.com3

Forty-three of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Whop came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

whop.com/blog/subscription-billing-software9

zoneandco.com/articles/20-best-subscription-billing-platforms-for-different-use-cases8

ecommerce-platforms.com/articles/best-recurring-payment-system5

resources.rework.com/tools/billing-revenue/best-subscription-billing-software-20265

kreante.co/post/subscription-billing-platforms-2026-shortlist4

learn.g2.com/best-subscription-management-software4

checkthat.ai/answers/what-is-the-best-subscription-billing-software3

g2.com/categories/subscription-billing/small-business3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

whop.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Whop takes 0% of first choices and Chargebee takes 60%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “subscription billing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best subscription billing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110,000 a month (“whop”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1,336 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 352,812 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 50,893 · 1,204 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 14,905
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

36+ ads · 25 text, 11 image · 29 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2025, as REGINA CELI DOS SANTOS, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 36 in the year. 84 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 38 of 54 in billing

Segment leader

60%

Chargebee

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 12 answers
Its own site cited: in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on whop.com

4,008

subdomains included

Content

2,036

counted in the table below

Documentation

993

Product · Integration

12 · 28

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1,572	26	2026-09-29	Ecommerce, SEO
Comparison	151	12	2026-09-02
Glossary or explainer	82	6	2026-09-15
Report or ebook	72	0	2025-12-02
Webinar or virtual event	45	2	2026-08-27	Direct mail
News or press	44	0	2026-05-27
Conference or event	39	0	2025-09-05
Podcast or video	25	0	2025-02-06
Case study	6	0	2025-10-16

Most recent

2026-09-29Verified partners blog
2026-09-28Start an llc from overseas blog
2026-09-28Kevin usuga blog
2026-09-26Neobank blueprint blog
2026-09-23Embedded finance statistics blog
2026-09-23Online business ideas blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page whop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Whop

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Whop.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: whop.com
Headquarters: New York City, United States
Founded: 2021

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Whop is the place for business operators. Scale up customer acquisition and distribute your products with a few clicks. Spin up an empire in an afternoon.
whop.com
For: business operators
whop.com
Price stated: Standard Pricing: Pay-as-you-go. No setup fees, no monthly costs. 2.7%+$0.30 for every successful card transaction. Custom Pricing: Tailored rates for high-volume businesses. whop.com/network/pricing
Starting price: 2.7%+$0.30 whop.com/network/pricing
Free plan or trial: Get started for free whop.com/network/pricing
Integrations claimed: 10 whop.com/network/pricing
Customers named: micro1InstinctSideShiftSales MomentumBAD Marketing
Not stated on the pages read: Certifications, hosting

What Whop's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: whop.com, whop.com/network/pricing, whop.com/network/products/payouts, whop.com/network/product/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Whop's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Whop, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Whop by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Whop is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Whop, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.