GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Unwrap · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Unwrap

5Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Unwrap was named 3 times in Customer intel and 1 other category, where Google Analytics 4 led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business41 of 151

under the label threshold

Mid-market66 of 158

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In customer intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Unwrap for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer intelligence and data science	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	66 of 158	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%
Customer feedback and surveys	Customer	0%	85 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Google Forms at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Unwrap yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Unwrap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mid-market feedback clustering without enterprise complexity” MiniMax M2.5 · Customer intel · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Unwrap, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Unwrap was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chattermill4 of 50Not in the top three

Mixpanel3 of 51Not in the top three

Hotjar3 of 50Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey3 of 50Not in the top three

Planhat2 of 51Not in the top three

InMoment2 of 50Not in the top three

Medallia2 of 50Not in the top three

Qualtrics2 of 50Not in the top three

Thematic2 of 50Not in the top three

HyperOrbit1 of 51Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Names read as Unwrap

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Unwrap; a claim can dispute any of them.

Unwrap.ai 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Unwrap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Unwrap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at unwrap.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.