GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Uniqode · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Uniqode

14Judge labels
4First choices
3Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Proximity for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 131 in the mid-market standing
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In proximity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Uniqode for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Retail, proximity and IoT marketingMarketing6%5 of 1310%9under 10 labels · led by Radar at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Uniqode yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Uniqode across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash12003
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall Value: Uniqode (formerly Beaconstac) ... most popular all-in-one proximity marketing platform and scales well to limited budgets.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proximity · budget prompt · first choice
“For 90% of mid-market B2B companies ... Uniqode is the easiest, most secure, and most CRM-integrated platform to deploy.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proximity · direct prompt · first choice
“or Uniqode's free plan if QR codes + NFC are sufficient for your use case” Kimi K2 · Proximity · budget prompt · first choice
“Need a marketer-friendly beacon campaign tool? Look at Beaconstac and similar campaign-oriented platforms.” GPT-5.4 mini · Proximity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uniqode, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uniqode was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Radar9 of 142Not in the top three
Kontakt.io7 of 140Not in the top three
PlotProjects4 of 142Not in the top three
Gimbal4 of 141Not in the top three
CleverTap4 of 140Not in the top three
Estimote4 of 140Not in the top three
GroundTruth4 of 140Not in the top three
Simpli.fi4 of 140Not in the top three
Beambox3 of 142Not in the top three
Bluedot3 of 141Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uniqode. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 14 answers that named Uniqode and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

indooratlas.com1
support.gimbal.com1

Two of the two domain citations in answers naming Uniqode came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Uniqode

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Uniqode; a claim can dispute any of them.
Uniqode (formerly Beaconstac) 5Beaconstac 4
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uniqode's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uniqode, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at uniqode.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.