AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Uniqode · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Uniqode

21Judge labels
6First choices
2Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Uniqode was named 8 times in Proximity, where Foursquare Proximity led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In proximity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Uniqode for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Retail, proximity and IoT marketingMarketing4%8 of 13025%8under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15%▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 3%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Uniqode held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Proximity · by segment

Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 114 → 4 of 145
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 3%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 13 of 120
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 15 of 115

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Proximity6%3%▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 3%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 5 → 8 of 130

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Uniqode across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B11002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative6 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels3
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Beaconstac/Uniqode Lite / Basic at ~$15-49/mo + a handful of beacons is the cheapest all-in proximity stack.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Proximity · budget prompt · first choice
“Beaconstac at $49/month offers the best balance of features, support, and scalability” Kimi K2 · Proximity · budget prompt · first choice
“Beaconstac is another beacon-first option often cited for ease of deployment across multiple beacon brands” Muse Glimmer 30B · Proximity · direct prompt · alternative
“Platforms like Swirl and Beaconstac offer beacon technology and geofencing at relatively low costs.” Mistral Small · Proximity · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“its plans can get incredibly expensive, requiring upfront annual billing of hundreds of dollars” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proximity · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd want to confirm the latest official feature set before recommending it.” GPT-5.4 mini · Proximity · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uniqode, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uniqode was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Radar15 of 214Not among the top eight
Gimbal7 of 212Not among the top eight
Kontakt.io7 of 212Not among the top eight
CleverTap5 of 210Not among the top eight
GroundTruth5 of 210Not among the top eight
Airship4 of 211Not among the top eight
Estimote4 of 211Not among the top eight
PlotProjects4 of 210Not among the top eight
Beambox3 of 211Not among the top eight
Xtremepush3 of 211Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uniqode. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Uniqode and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thecmo.com15
g2.com11
sourceforge.net11
gartner.com8
radar.com8
slashdot.org7
us.fitgap.com7
worldmetrics.org7
devbeaconstac.myshopify.com6
f6s.com6

Eighty-six of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Uniqode came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

uniqode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Uniqode takes 4% of first choices and Foursquare Proximity takes 15%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “proximity marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best proximity marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“uniqode”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
13 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 79,223 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,029 · 152 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,897
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
115+ ads · 84 text, 31 video · 31 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2023, as Uniqode Phygital Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 108 in the year, 7 before. 5 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 130 in proximity
Segment leader
15%
Foursquare Proximity
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on uniqode.com
749
subdomains included
Content
423
counted in the table below
Documentation
239
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog30692026-09-04CRM
Case study25undated
Template or tool2402024-12-23
Report or ebook22undated
Comparison2202025-09-22
News or press11undated
Conference or event1002026-03-08
Glossary or explainer3undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page uniqode.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Uniqode

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Uniqode; a claim can dispute any of them.
Beaconstac 4Beaconstac (now Uniqode) 1Beaconstac / Uniqode 1Uniqode (formerly Beaconstac) 1

Follow Uniqode

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Uniqode is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
QR Code Generator for Businesses | Create & Track | Uniqode
For
Businesses
Price stated
$9 to $399 uniqode.com
Starting price
9 uniqode.com
Free plan or trial
Start free trial uniqode.com
Certifications
GDPR CompliantSOC 2 Type 2 CompliantHIPAA CompliantISO 27001:2022 CertifiedSOC 2 Type 2HIPAAGDPRISO
Customers named
The Cigna GroupLionsgate EntertainmentMarriott ArubaMaesaBBQGuysDirect Response Media Group (DRMG)PepsiCoAmazon
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Uniqode's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: uniqode.com, uniqode.com/pricing, trust.uniqode.com, uniqode.com/customer-stories, uniqode.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uniqode's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uniqode, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Uniqode by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Uniqode is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Uniqode, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at uniqode.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.