GTM AI Index
Index › Vendors › Unify · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Unify

18Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Sales engagement for small business buyers
Rank 56 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business41 of 79
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market56 of 71
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 60
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Unify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
AI SDR agentsSales0%56 of 710%1under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 20%
Sales engagement platformsSales0%41 of 550%1under 10 labels · led by Salesloft at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Unify yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Unify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Unify (enterprise) ... Salesforce-heavy → Unify/Outreach” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI SDR · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Unify, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Unify was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apollo.io12 of 185Not in the top three
Mixmax11 of 180Not in the top three
HubSpot Sales Hub9 of 182Not in the top three
Smartlead9 of 180Not in the top three
Instantly8 of 180Not in the top three
Outreach8 of 180Not in the top three
Salesloft7 of 180Not in the top three
Reply.io6 of 181Not in the top three
Artisan5 of 181Not in the top three
Klenty5 of 180Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Unify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 18 answers that named Unify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com3
unifygtm.comYour site2
alexberman.com1
amplemarket.com1
artisan.co1
attrock.com1
autobound.ai1
b2breviews.com1
blog.hubspot.com1
brightdata.com1

Eleven of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Unify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

alexberman.com/best-b2b-lead-database-tools1
amplemarket.com/blog/best-ai-sales-agents1
artisan.co/blog/best-b2b-data-providers1
attrock.com/blog/sales-engagement-platform1
autobound.ai/blog/ai-sdr-tools-guide1
b2breviews.com/sales-engagement-platforms1
blog.hubspot.com/sales/sales-engagement1
brightdata.com/blog/web-data/best-b2b-data-providers1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Unify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Unify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at unifygtm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack