Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 of 48, unchanged
3 categories · Named, not rankedUnify
21Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Unify was named 8 times in Enrichment and 2 other categories, where Apollo.io led with 73%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market19 of 50
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise32 of 53
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In enrichment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Unify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data enrichment | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 19 of 50 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| AI SDR agents | Sales | 0% | 33 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 26 of 66 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Unify held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Enrichment · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrichment | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 19 of 50, unchanged |
| AI SDR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 33 of 77 |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 39 → 26 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Unify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Unify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Platforms that utilize "Co-pilot" or "Human-in-the-Loop" (HITL) models... (e.g., Unify or Regie.ai)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI SDR · negative prompt · alternative
“Unify - Offers a growth plan for $1,740/year, which may be suitable for high-growth companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative
“Best For: Sales teams running modern, "warm outbound" GTM strategies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI SDR · comparative prompt · alternative
“All-in-one: Amplemarket or Unify (strong multichannel, CRM fidelity)” Grok 4.20 · Sales engagement · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Unify, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Unify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Unify, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Unify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Unify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Unify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
unifygtm.comYour site19
pipeline.zoominfo.com10
artisan.co7
blog.hubspot.com7
salesforge.ai7
amplemarket.com6
clay.com6
apollo.io5
cloudtalk.io5
learn.g2.com5
Fifty-eight of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming Unify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
unifygtm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Unify takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.ShowHide
Search and answers
unifygtm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Unify takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b data enrichment tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b data enrichment tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 33,100 a month (“unify”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 29,422 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 22,100 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,267 · 255 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 980
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 50 in enrichment
Segment leader
73%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on unifygtm.com
1,999
subdomains included
Content
1,157
counted in the table below
Documentation
295
Product · Integration
16 · 17
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,045 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ABM | |
| Comparison | 38 | 22 | 2026-09-24 | CRM | |
| Conference or event | 20 | undated | |||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 17 | 2 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 7 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Template or tool | 8 | 6 | 2026-09-24 | CRM | |
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Automation vs human in the loop outbound comparison
- 2026-09-24B2b data provider integration checklist template or tool
- 2026-09-24Crm integration evaluation checklist template or tool
- 2026-09-15Automation vs authenticity personalized outbound comparison
- 2026-09-15Crm integration audit checklist template or tool
- 2026-09-15Hire sdrs vs ai sdr tools honest math comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page unifygtm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Unify
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Unify; a claim can dispute any of them.
Unify / SyncGTM 1
Follow Unify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Unify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Unify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Outbound agents for every rep
- For
- sellers
- Price stated
- Free, Base, Pro, Business unifygtm.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 unifygtm.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free unifygtm.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type II compliance
- Customers named
- AirwallexPerplexityGuruAbacumCampfireJustworksNavatticPylon
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Unify's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: unifygtm.com, unifygtm.com/pricing, trust.unifygtm.com, unifygtm.com/product/plays, unifygtm.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Unify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Unify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Unify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Unify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Unify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.