GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Terminus / ABX by DemandScience · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Terminus / ABX by DemandScience

3Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
2 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Terminus / ABX by DemandScience was named 2 times in ABM, where AdRoll ABM led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In abm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Terminus / ABX by DemandScience for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing0%63 of 7650%2under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Terminus / ABX by DemandScience yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Terminus / ABX by DemandScience across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01012
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Terminus if your ABM strategy is mainly multi-channel campaign execution.” Perplexity Sonar · ABM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Terminus has been absorbed into DemandScience, so buyers should verify current product capabilities, support, and roadmap” Perplexity Sonar · ABM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Terminus / ABX by DemandScience, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Terminus / ABX by DemandScience was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Demandbase3 of 32Not in the top three
6sense3 of 31Not in the top three
AdRoll ABM3 of 30Not in the top three
HubSpot ABM2 of 30Not in the top three
Clay1 of 30Not in the top three
LinkedIn Campaign Manager1 of 30Not in the top three
Madison Logic1 of 30Not in the top three
ZoomInfo Marketing OS1 of 30Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Terminus / ABX by DemandScience. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Terminus / ABX by DemandScience and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

demandbase.com3
cience.com2
cleverly.co2
factors.ai2
gartner.com2
hginsights.com2
pipeline.zoominfo.com2
salesmotion.io2
ziellab.com2
6sense.com1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Terminus / ABX by DemandScience came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Terminus / ABX by DemandScience's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Terminus / ABX by DemandScience, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at terminus.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack