GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Tealium iQ · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Tealium iQ

106Judge labels
23First choices
40Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
43% in Tag management for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 59 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 36% of its 36 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
In tag management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tealium iQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Tag managementGTM data and infrastructure9%2 of 5936%36criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tealium iQ yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tealium iQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash01034
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast12025
Mistral Small12115
DeepSeek V4 Flash01023
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00033
Kimi K202013
GLM 4.7 FlashX13004
MiniMax M2.511013

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels9
Paraphrase19 labels5
Comparative22 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels3
Scale-constrained16 labels6
Negative19 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative106 labels in all, every segment counted; 23 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Suitability: Strong candidate for 500-person company... Tealium, Adobe, or a custom enterprise solution are likely your best starting points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Tag management · scale prompt · first choice
“Tealium iQ | Enterprise governance/integrations ... 1,300+ connectors; strong RBAC/audit; server-side EventStream.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Tag management · scale prompt · first choice
“Tealium iQ offers the best balance of enterprise-grade features, compliance capabilities, and mid-market pricing” Mistral Small · Tag management · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Tealium iQ or Google Tag Manager (GTM)” MiniMax M2.5 · Tag management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they are generally not recommended for mid-market B2B companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Tag management · direct prompt · hard negative
“Tealium for organizations without $100K+ annual budget” Mistral Small · Tag management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Others like Tealium/Ensighten: High TCO, complex setup—fine for enterprises but overkill/expensive for SMBs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Tag management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Very expensive: Can be overkill for smaller teams - Complex setup: Requires significant technical expertise” MiniMax M2.5 · Tag management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tealium iQ, over the 106 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tealium iQ was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Adobe Experience Platform Tags91 of 1060Not in the top three
Piwik PRO47 of 1061Not in the top three
Segment41 of 1060Not in the top three
Matomo Tag Manager30 of 1061Not in the top three
Ensighten23 of 1060Not in the top three
Ensighten Manage23 of 1060Not in the top three
Piwik PRO Tag Manager23 of 1060Not in the top three
Matomo22 of 1060Not in the top three
ObservePoint9 of 1060Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tealium iQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 106 answers that named Tealium iQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

usercentrics.com12
g2.com11
guideflow.com11
checkthat.ai8
gartner.com8
lokker.com8
piwik.pro8
xerago.ai8
peerspot.com7
datatrue.com6

Eighty-seven of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Tealium iQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Tealium is the company behind Tealium iQ.
Website
tealium.com
Headquarters
San Diego, United States
Founded
2008

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tealium iQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tealium iQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tealium.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack