| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tag management | GTM data and infrastructure | 9% | 2 of 59 | 36% | 36 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Suitability: Strong candidate for 500-person company... Tealium, Adobe, or a custom enterprise solution are likely your best starting points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Tag management · scale prompt · first choice
“Tealium iQ | Enterprise governance/integrations ... 1,300+ connectors; strong RBAC/audit; server-side EventStream.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Tag management · scale prompt · first choice
“Tealium iQ offers the best balance of enterprise-grade features, compliance capabilities, and mid-market pricing” Mistral Small · Tag management · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Tealium iQ or Google Tag Manager (GTM)” MiniMax M2.5 · Tag management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“they are generally not recommended for mid-market B2B companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Tag management · direct prompt · hard negative
“Tealium for organizations without $100K+ annual budget” Mistral Small · Tag management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Others like Tealium/Ensighten: High TCO, complex setup—fine for enterprises but overkill/expensive for SMBs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Tag management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Very expensive: Can be overkill for smaller teams - Complex setup: Requires significant technical expertise” MiniMax M2.5 · Tag management · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 106 answers that named Tealium iQ and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-seven of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Tealium iQ came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tealium iQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tealium iQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tealium.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.