Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 of 83, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedSurveySensum
11Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SurveySensum was named 6 times in Feedback, where CustomerGauge led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business32 of 85
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 84
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise28 of 68
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SurveySensum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 2% | 14 of 84 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SurveySensum held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feedback · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 40 → 14 of 81
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 of 64, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feedback | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 14 of 84 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SurveySensum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SurveySensum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the best recommendation is SurveySensum” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“best if you want AI-powered analysis and operational workflows with a mid-market fit” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · direct prompt · alternative
“Other options include SurveySensum, AskNicely, Retently, and Zonka Feedback” Llama 4 Maverick · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“SurveySensum is the most commonly recommended mid-market value pick.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SurveySensum, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SurveySensum was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SurveySensum, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SurveySensum was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SurveySensum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named SurveySensum and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
surveysensum.comYour site8
blog.hubspot.com7
chattermill.com6
customergauge.com5
surveysparrow.com5
survicate.com5
zonkafeedback.com5
fluidsurveys.com4
guideflow.com4
retently.com4
Forty-five of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming SurveySensum came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
surveysensum.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SurveySensum takes 2% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
surveysensum.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SurveySensum takes 2% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer feedback and survey platform”
3
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 84 in feedback
Segment leader
24%
CustomerGauge
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on surveysensum.com
679
subdomains included
Content
562
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 472 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 58 | 0 | 2026-06-12 | ||
| Case study | 18 | 0 | 2019-09-10 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2022-08-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-12Delighted alternatives comparison
- 2026-06-11Qualtrics vs medallia comparison
- 2026-06-11Qualtrics pricing blog
- 2026-06-11Getfeedback alternatives comparison
- 2026-06-04Customer feedback tools blog
- 2026-06-03Voice of the customer tools blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page surveysensum.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SurveySensum
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SurveySensum is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SurveySensum is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Enabled Customer Feedback Platform
- For
- Enterprises looking to measure and act on NPS, CSAT, Employee Experience, and Market Research
- Price stated
- We offer three plans: Starter CX, Self-Serve CX, Managed CX; $50/Hr; $100/Session surveysensum.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 50 surveysensum.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Request a FREE Demo surveysensum.com
- Integrations claimed
- 8 surveysensum.com/pricing
- Certifications
- ISMS CertifiedHIPAAGDPRSOC 2ISO 27001
- Hosting
- your native countryyour country
- Customers named
- Nissan - IndomobilMercedes - DaimlerAstra Honda MotorAllianzIndosatLink NetPine LabsBizagi
What SurveySensum's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: surveysensum.com, surveysensum.com, surveysensum.com/pricing, surveysensum.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SurveySensum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SurveySensum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SurveySensum by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SurveySensum is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SurveySensum, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.