Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 of 83, unchanged
1 category · RankedCanny
28Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Feedback for small business buyers
Rank 22 of 84 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 85
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market22 of 84
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise65 of 68
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Canny for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 22 of 84 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Canny held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feedback · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 22 of 81
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 73 → 62 of 64
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feedback | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 22 of 84 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Canny across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Canny across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“best if you need a lightweight feedback board and roadmap-style idea collection” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · budget prompt · alternative
“Product feature requests and roadmapping → UserVoice, Canny, or Frill” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best when you want users to vote on ideas and prioritize requests.” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
“Canny or Refiner (SaaS/B2B product-focused)” Grok 4.20 · Feedback · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Canny, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Canny was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Canny, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Canny was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Canny. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 28 answers that named Canny and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com18
typeform.com15
canny.ioYour site14
surveysparrow.com10
chattermill.com9
survicate.com9
blog.hubspot.com8
frill.co7
softr.io7
zonkafeedback.com7
Ninety of the 104 domain citations in answers naming Canny came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
canny.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Canny takes 0% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
canny.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Canny takes 0% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“canny”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 579 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 48,736 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,960 · 173 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,497
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 13 clicks and $417 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 84 in feedback
Segment leader
24%
CustomerGauge
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 28 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 28 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on canny.io
1,521
subdomains included
Content
257
counted in the table below
Documentation
189
Product · Integration
40 · 19
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 192 | 3 | 2026-08-26 | SEO | |
| Case study | 28 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 0 | 2025-06-03 | ||
| Comparison | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-26Build ai feedback capture in house blog
- 2026-08-19So you want to build a feedback portal blog
- 2026-07-27Best voice of the customer tools blog
- 2026-06-1712713585 portal view vs internal view for ideas comparison
- 2026-05-05Best ai feedback tools blog
- 2025-08-22Feature voting best practices blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page canny.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Canny
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Canny is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Canny is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered customer feedback platform
- For
- product, sales, customer success, and marketing teams
- Price stated
- Get started free; No credit card required canny.io
- Starting price
- 0 canny.io
- Free plan or trial
- Get started free canny.io
- Integrations claimed
- 55 canny.io/features/mcp
- Certifications
- CCPAGDPRSOC 2SOC 2 certified
- Customers named
- ahrefscirclecihiveaxiosclickupharnessstrapimissive
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Canny's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: canny.io, canny.io/pricing, canny.io/security, canny.io/features/mcp, canny.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Canny's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Canny, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Canny by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Canny is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Canny, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.