GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › SuiteCRM · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

SuiteCRM

5Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SuiteCRM was named 3 times in CRM and 2 other categories, where HubSpot CRM led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market65 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprise32 of 61

under the label threshold

In crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SuiteCRM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM	Revenue operations	0%	65 of 71	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 41%
Data management platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	129 of 183	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Segment at 18%
Sales commissions and incentive compensation	Revenue operations	0%	42 of 51	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Everstage at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SuiteCRM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SuiteCRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“flagged as problematic when forced into commission-calculation roles” Perplexity Sonar · Commissions · negative prompt · hard negative

“The Self-Hosting Trap (Open Source)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SuiteCRM, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SuiteCRM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CaptivateIQ2 of 50Not in the top three

Everstage2 of 50Not in the top three

HubSpot CRM2 of 50Not in the top three

Odoo2 of 50Not in the top three

Oracle HCM2 of 50Not in the top three

Salesforce Sales Cloud2 of 50Not in the top three

Salesforce Spiff2 of 50Not in the top three

BigQuery1 of 51Not in the top three

Bigin by Zoho1 of 51Not in the top three

ClicData1 of 51Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SuiteCRM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 5 answers that named SuiteCRM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

captivateiq.com2

cotocus.com2

everstage.com2

forma.ai2

getcentify.com2

guideflow.com2

hrsoft.com2

qobra.co2

quotapath.com2

selecthub.com2

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming SuiteCRM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

captivateiq.com/blog/best-sales-compensation-software2

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-commission-tracking-how-to-do-it-successfully2

cotocus.com/blog/top-10-commission-tracking-software-features-pros-cons-comparison2

everstage.com/10-best-commission-management-software2

everstage.com/10-best-sales-commission-software2

forma.ai/resources/article/commissions-software2

forma.ai/resources/article/incentive-compensation-management-software2

getcentify.com/best-sales-commission-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SuiteCRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SuiteCRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at suitecrm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.