Every category where a model named ClicData for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data management platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	5%	5 of 183	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Segment at 18%
Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing	GTM data and infrastructure	1%	10 of 100	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 42%
Dashboards and data visualization	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	39 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Power BI at 62%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ClicData yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ClicData across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels6

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most small businesses, ClicData offers the best balance of affordability and functionality” Mistral Small · DMP · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with Google BigQuery or ClicData for your warehouse” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Warehouse & ETL · budget prompt · first choice

“Small team (<10 people) | Twilio Segment (free tier) or ClicData” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DMP · budget prompt · first choice

“ClicData ⭐ (Highly Recommended for SMBs)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DMP · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ClicData, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClicData was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Snowflake5 of 110Not in the top three

BigQuery4 of 111Not in the top three

Fivetran4 of 111Not in the top three

dbt4 of 110Not in the top three

Amazon Redshift3 of 110Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI3 of 110Not in the top three

Segment3 of 110Not in the top three

Tableau3 of 110Not in the top three

Collibra2 of 110Not in the top three

Domo2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClicData. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 11 answers that named ClicData and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

improvado.io4

domo.com3

g2.com3

ask-luca.com2

capterra.com2

clicdata.comYour site2

cometly.com2

estuary.dev2

fanruan.com2

genixly.io2

Twenty-two of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming ClicData came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ask-luca.com/blogs/best-reverse-etl-tools2

capterra.com/data-management-software/s/small-businesses2

clicdata.com/blog/best-data-management-software-for-smbs2

cometly.com/post/marketing-data-warehouse-alternatives2

domo.com/learn/article/best-reverse-etl-platforms2

estuary.dev/blog/data-management-tools2

fanruan.com/en/blog/best-data-management-tool2

g2.com/categories/data-management-platform-dmp/small-business2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClicData's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClicData, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clicdata.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.