GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Signature.email · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Signature.email

5Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Signature.email was named 1 time in Email signatures, where Exclaimer led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business12 of 50

under the label threshold

Mid-market30 of 48

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 49

under the label threshold

In email signatures · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Signature.email for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email signature management	Marketing	0%	30 of 48	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Exclaimer at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Signature.email yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Signature.email across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Signature.email allows you to pay a single yearly fee, making them highly economical” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email signatures · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Signature.email, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Signature.email was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CodeTwo Email Signatures 3654 of 52Not among the top eight

Exclaimer4 of 50Not among the top eight

WiseStamp3 of 50Not among the top eight

HubSpot Email Signature Generator2 of 51Not among the top eight

MySignature2 of 51Not among the top eight

Newoldstamp2 of 50Not among the top eight

SyncSignature2 of 50Not among the top eight

BulkSignature1 of 51Not among the top eight

Bybrand1 of 50Not among the top eight

Echosig1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Signature.email. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Signature.email and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

newoldstamp.com4

syncsignature.com4

mysignature.ioYour site3

sighq.app3

anniemargaritayang.com2

bulksignature.com2

codetwo.com2

exclaimer.com2

mailbutler.io2

reddit.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Signature.email came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

newoldstamp.com/blog/email-signature-software4

mysignature.io/blog/best-email-signature-generators-comparison3

sighq.app/posts/email-signature-software-pricing3

anniemargaritayang.com/blog/top-3-most-affordable-professional-email-signature-software2

bulksignature.com/blog/best-email-signature-software2

mailbutler.io/blog/email/email-signature-management-tools2

reddit.com/r/helpdesk/comments/1vgwlvo/best_email_signature_software_for_businesses_in2

signature.email/pricing2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mysignature.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Signature.email takes 0% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 59,004 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,527 · 360 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,102
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 11 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as Newoldstamp Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 30 of 48 in email signatures

Segment leader

33%

Exclaimer

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 5 answers
Its own site cited: in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on mysignature.io

555

subdomains included

Content

249

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	166	7	2026-08-17	Email signatures
Comparison	55	0	2026-05-20
Conference or event	11	0	2025-01-30
Case study	9	undated
Template or tool	4	undated
Glossary or explainer	4	0	2026-04-03

Most recent

2026-08-17Ai email deliverability blog
2026-08-13Email signature clicks study blog
2026-08-10Best digital business cards blog
2026-08-07Automated email follow ups blog
2026-07-27Email signature deliverability blog
2026-07-21Ceo email signatures blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mysignature.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Signature.email

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Signature.email's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Signature.email, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Signature.email by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Signature.email is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Signature.email, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.