Every category where a model named SalesScreen for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Sales gamification	Sales	15%	3 of 64	16%	56	accepted challenger
Sales coaching and training	Sales	0%	84 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	100 of 123	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SalesScreen yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SalesScreen across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	0	1	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	1	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	2	1	7
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	1	3
Grok 4.20	2	1	1	1	5
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	0	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	3	1	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	1	1	0	4
Kimi K2	1	3	1	0	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	4	0	1	0	5
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	1	2	0	1	4
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	1	1	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct29 labels3

Paraphrase30 labels9

Comparative34 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained22 labels3

Scale-constrained18 labels3

Negative29 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative162 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a typical mid-sized B2B company, SalesScreen or Spinify are solid choices that balance features, ease of use, and ROI” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Top safer bets: Spinify (best real-time praise), SalesScreen (reliable), but vet for your CRM/stack.” Grok 4.20 · Sales gamification · negative prompt · first choice

“SalesScreen is widely considered the strongest all-around contender for mid-market B2B teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales gamification · direct prompt · first choice

“Based on reviews, SalesScreen tends to get better marks for: Fast setup” Kimi K2 · Sales gamification · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be cautious if your CRM data is messy or delayed, because its strong visualization and contest features still depend on clean CRM data” Perplexity Sonar · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative

“SalesScreen — good motivation features, but reviews note data/reporting and CRM integration pain points.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative

“designed for larger organizations. They typically require annual contracts, have minimum user thresholds” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales gamification · budget prompt · soft negative

“Some users report occasional bugs affecting leaderboard accuracy, CRM integration setup can be complex” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SalesScreen, over the 162 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SalesScreen was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spinify146 of 16246Compare →

Ambition134 of 16226Compare →

Plecto59 of 1621Not among the top eight

LevelEleven52 of 1622Not among the top eight

SmartWinnr44 of 1621Not among the top eight

Hoopla35 of 1620Not among the top eight

Pointagram34 of 16214Compare →

Centrical30 of 1621Not among the top eight

OneUp Sales22 of 1621Compare →

Leaderboarded21 of 1627Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SalesScreen. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 161 of the 162 answers that named SalesScreen and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com114

guideflow.com94

kendo.ai87

leaderboarded.com75

techdogs.com74

attention.com63

salesscreen.comYour site54

spinify.com54

prospeo.io52

openloyalty.io50

663 of the 717 domain citations in answers naming SalesScreen came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-sales-gamification-software93

kendo.ai/blogs/best-sales-gamification-software-tools85

g2.com/categories/sales-gamification66

attention.com/blog-posts/top-sales-gamification-platforms62

leaderboarded.com/sales-gamification-software60

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/top-sales-gamification-software55

fitsmallbusiness.com/sales-gamification-software48

openloyalty.io/insider/best-gamification-software48

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

salesscreen.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SalesScreen takes 15% of first choices and Spinify takes 31%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “sales gamification platform”

Position for “best sales gamification platform”

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“salesscreen”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 2,593 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 392 · 60 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,174
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

64 ads · 32 image, 31 text, 1 video · 3 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2024, as Dogu SalesScreen AS, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 46 in the year, 18 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

15%

rank 3 of 64 in sales gamification

Segment leader

31%

Spinify

First choices: 18 across its categories
Named in: 162 answers
Its own site cited: in 161 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on salesscreen.com

590

subdomains included

Content

452

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

12 · 40

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	365	38	2026-09-24	Sales gamification, CRM
Webinar or virtual event	38	undated		Sales gamification
Case study	32	undated
Comparison	6	0	2025-08-01
Report or ebook	4	0	2026-05-22
Conference or event	3	0	2017-04-03
Glossary or explainer	2	undated
Template or tool	1	undated
Podcast or video	1	0	2017-10-06

Most recent

2026-09-24Gamification fatigue blog
2026-09-23Sales forecasting blog
2026-09-22Sales competition ideas for multiple offices blog
2026-09-21Ai sales coaching blog
2026-09-16Sales dashboard software blog
2026-09-14Sales performance review questions blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page salesscreen.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as SalesScreen

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SalesScreen; a claim can dispute any of them.

SalesScreen (Essentials) 1

Follow SalesScreen

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SalesScreen is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Motivate your sales force with the most comprehensive and effective gamification platform in the game.
salesscreen.com
For: Sales teams, sales managers, sales leaders
salesscreen.com
Price stated: Essentials $15 per user per month; Scale $30 per user / month; Pro $45 per user / month; Enterprise Custom Pricing salesscreen.com/pricing
Starting price: 15 salesscreen.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free trial salesscreen.com
Certifications: GDPRISO/IEC 27001ISO 27001:2022ISO 27001SOC 1SOC 2SOC 3
Hosting: European data centers
Customers named: SpareBank 1AllianzAcrisureUtleiemeglerenDacha Real EstateGoodleapBank NorwegianWaterCircles
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What SalesScreen's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: salesscreen.com, salesscreen.com/pricing, salesscreen.com/security, salesscreen.com/solutions/draft-early-signals, salesscreen.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SalesScreen's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SalesScreen, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SalesScreen by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SalesScreen is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SalesScreen, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where SalesScreen is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

SalesScreen is among the products AI models recommend first in Sales gamification this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/sales/sales-gamification/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/salesscreen--sales-gamification-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Sales gamification, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Sales gamification standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/sales/sales-gamification/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/salesscreen--sales-gamification-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Sales gamification, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Sales gamification standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/sales/sales-gamification/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/salesscreen--sales-gamification-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Sales gamification, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Sales gamification standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.