Every category where a model named Centrical for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Sales gamification	Sales	0%	54 of 64	43%	7	under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Centrical yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Centrical across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Ideal if you want to heavily tie gamification to training, learning management, and frontline onboarding.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales gamification · scale prompt · alternative

“Mid‑size workflow‑tied gamification? → Centrical” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales gamification · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise-heavy (e.g., Centrical)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales gamification · direct prompt · hard negative

“Centrical — powerful, but can feel complex, with customization/reporting concerns.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative

“Be cautious if you have limited admin bandwidth or need fast time-to-value.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Centrical, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Centrical was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spinify31 of 3610Not among the top eight

Ambition30 of 368Not among the top eight

SalesScreen30 of 364Not among the top eight

SmartWinnr15 of 360Not among the top eight

Plecto13 of 360Not among the top eight

LevelEleven12 of 360Not among the top eight

Hoopla9 of 360Not among the top eight

Leaderboarded3 of 362Not among the top eight

Master-O3 of 360Not among the top eight

OneUp Sales3 of 360Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Centrical. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 36 answers that named Centrical and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com24

kendo.ai19

techdogs.com19

guideflow.com18

attention.com16

leaderboarded.com14

salesscreen.com12

spinify.com12

openloyalty.io11

us.fitgap.com11

156 of the 156 domain citations in answers naming Centrical came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

kendo.ai/blogs/best-sales-gamification-software-tools19

guideflow.com/blog/best-sales-gamification-software18

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/top-sales-gamification-software17

attention.com/blog-posts/top-sales-gamification-platforms15

g2.com/categories/sales-gamification13

g2.com/categories/sales-gamification/enterprise12

openloyalty.io/insider/best-gamification-software10

leaderboarded.com/sales-gamification-software9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

centrical.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Centrical takes 0% of first choices and Spinify takes 31%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “sales gamification platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best sales gamification platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“centrical”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 9,937 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 6,265 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,279 · 166 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,374
Paid Google search: 11 searches its ads show for, about 42 clicks and $1,170 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

26 ads · 26 text · 12 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Biz-Effective Ltd, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 54 of 64 in sales gamification

Segment leader

31%

Spinify

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 36 answers
Its own site cited: in 35 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on centrical.com

1,115

subdomains included

Content

751

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

27 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	606	11	2026-09-23	CRM, Contact center
Conference or event	48	1	2026-08-13
Case study	35	1	2026-07-28
Report or ebook	24	0	2025-02-06	CRM
Webinar or virtual event	17	0	2026-02-25
Comparison	7	2	2026-09-10
Template or tool	4	undated
Podcast or video	4	0	2022-03-29
News or press	4	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-23Iso iec 42001 certification blog
2026-09-10Ai guided coaching vs unassisted coaching comparison
2026-09-072025 select awards blog
2026-08-31Centrical vs zenarate comparison
2026-08-13Big game conference or event
2026-08-03Attrition in the contact center what the teams managing it well do differently blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

June 24, 2026CCW Happy HourF1® Arcade Las Vegas, Las Vegas · hosted

As the event pages on centrical.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page centrical.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Centrical

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Centrical; a claim can dispute any of them.

Centrical (formerly GamEffective) 1

Follow Centrical

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Centrical's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Centrical, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Centrical by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Centrical is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Centrical, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.