1 category · RankedHoopla
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales gamification | Sales | 0% | 21 of 64 | 32% | 19 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Hoopla across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“delivers real-time sales celebrations and leaderboards on TVs to boost team energy and performance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales gamification · comparative prompt · alternative
“Hoopla | Enterprise broadcasting and visibility | Strong for large orgs with distributed teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales gamification · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose Hoopla if your priority is office energy and TV-based sales floor culture” Kimi K2 · Sales gamification · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best if you want CRM-heavy, broadcast-style gamification: Hoopla.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Most universally flagged platforms to avoid: Hoopla (dated tech, Salesforce-lock-in)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales gamification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Hoopla — Custom pricing, typically enterprise-tier” Kimi K2 · Sales gamification · budget prompt · hard negative
“otherwise it's a product to avoid for new buys.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales gamification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Great for visual leaderboards and celebrations, but better for larger enterprises (higher cost, more complexity).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hoopla, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hoopla was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 46 answers that named Hoopla and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
193 of the 193 domain citations in answers naming Hoopla came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hoopla.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hoopla takes 0% of first choices and Spinify takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 246,000 a month (“hoopla”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5,452 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 987 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 57 · 6 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 507
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 16 clicks and $357 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 46 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 44 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 30 | 29 | 2026-08-10 | Sales gamification | |
| Comparison | 4 | 4 | 2026-08-07 | Sales gamification | |
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-10Sales gamification how leading companies turn sales performance into a daily game blog
- 2026-08-10Medical device sales teams motivating reps across long complex sales cycles blog
- 2026-08-10Pharma sales rep engagement gamifying territory performance without compliance headaches blog
- 2026-08-10Why insurance agencies are turning to real time leaderboards to hit renewal targets blog
- 2026-08-10Sales gamification for mortgage teams turning rate locks and closings into motivation blog
- 2026-08-07Sales motivation how to build a sales leaderboard that actually motivates not discourages blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hoopla.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Hoopla
Follow Hoopla
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hoopla's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hoopla, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hoopla by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Hoopla is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hoopla, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.