Every category where a model named Leaderboarded for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Sales gamification	Sales	2%	8 of 64	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Leaderboarded yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Leaderboarded across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase13 labels3

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels4

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Leaderboarded and Captain Up seem to be suitable options for a mid-sized B2B company” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Leaderboarded fills this gap for smaller teams (2–50 reps) with a flat-rate pricing model.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales gamification · comparative prompt · alternative

“Simpler, more affordable options - Good if you want something lightweight to start” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Simple, Beautiful TV Leaderboards: Leaderboarded” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales gamification · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Choose Leaderboarded only if you need a budget-friendly, flat-rate option and your use case is relatively simple.” Perplexity Sonar · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Simpler/cheaper for small teams (<50 reps), but lacks deep CRM integrations and advanced B2B contest logic.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Leaderboarded, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leaderboarded was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spinify24 of 2611Not among the top eight

Ambition22 of 263Not among the top eight

SalesScreen21 of 264Not among the top eight

Plecto10 of 260Not among the top eight

Pointagram6 of 262Not among the top eight

Hoopla5 of 260Not among the top eight

LevelEleven5 of 260Not among the top eight

Zoho Motivator5 of 260Not among the top eight

MakeTheBoard4 of 260Not among the top eight

SmartWinnr4 of 260Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leaderboarded. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named Leaderboarded and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

leaderboarded.comYour site24

guideflow.com16

g2.com15

fitsmallbusiness.com14

techdogs.com12

kendo.ai11

prospeo.io10

attention.com9

openloyalty.io9

spotio.com9

105 of the 129 domain citations in answers naming Leaderboarded came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

leaderboarded.com/sales-gamification-software22

guideflow.com/blog/best-sales-gamification-software16

fitsmallbusiness.com/sales-gamification-software14

leaderboarded.com/sales-leaderboard13

kendo.ai/blogs/best-sales-gamification-software-tools11

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/top-sales-gamification-software10

attention.com/blog-posts/top-sales-gamification-platforms9

openloyalty.io/insider/best-gamification-software9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

leaderboarded.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leaderboarded takes 2% of first choices and Spinify takes 31%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “sales gamification platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best sales gamification platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 33,100 a month (“leaderboarded”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 4,525 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 41,689 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,385 · 259 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 970
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

3 ads · 2 text, 1 image · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2026, as Caspar von Wrede, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 64 in sales gamification

Segment leader

31%

Spinify

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 26 answers
Its own site cited: in 26 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on leaderboarded.com

268

subdomains included

Content

165

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	140	10	2026-09-25	Sales gamification
Comparison	15	undated
Conference or event	4	2	2026-07-27
Template or tool	3	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	1	2026-08-10
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-25Year end giving campaign blog
2026-08-30Christmas minute to win it games blog
2026-08-22Gamification software blog
2026-08-20What does pf mean in sports blog
2026-08-10What is a magic number in baseball glossary or explainer
2026-08-09Leaderboard ideas blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page leaderboarded.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Leaderboarded

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leaderboarded's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leaderboarded, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leaderboarded by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Leaderboarded is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Leaderboarded, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.