Every category where a model named Plecto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Sales gamification	Sales	0%	17 of 64	13%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Plecto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Plecto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	3	0	1	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	3	1	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labelsNone

Comparative25 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Plecto is unparalleled at pulling data from multiple, disparate systems and visualizing them on unified, highly professional dashboards and leaderboards.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“ideal for teams wanting flexibility to build their own KPI dashboards from scratch with gamification elements layered on top” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales gamification · comparative prompt · alternative

“Plecto specializes in visual KPI dashboards and multi-system data visualization on any screen” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Plecto is another strong option specifically identified for mid-market companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales gamification · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Setup is not beginner-friendly and can be time-consuming, some users experience minor delays in leaderboard updates, and Salesforce integration is reportedly difficult to implement.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative

“Plecto can feel sterile. Users also report a steep learning curve” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative

“Plecto — test data setup and custom competitions carefully.” GPT-6 Luna · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Plecto, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plecto was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spinify63 of 6724Not among the top eight

SalesScreen59 of 6710Not among the top eight

Ambition58 of 6711Not among the top eight

Hoopla21 of 670Not among the top eight

LevelEleven20 of 671Not among the top eight

SmartWinnr19 of 670Not among the top eight

Pointagram17 of 675Not among the top eight

Centrical13 of 671Not among the top eight

Leaderboarded10 of 673Not among the top eight

OneUp Sales10 of 671Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plecto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 67 answers that named Plecto and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com49

guideflow.com42

kendo.ai39

leaderboarded.com34

prospeo.io32

techdogs.com31

attention.com28

spinify.com25

fitsmallbusiness.com23

openloyalty.io21

324 of the 324 domain citations in answers naming Plecto came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-sales-gamification-software42

kendo.ai/blogs/best-sales-gamification-software-tools39

g2.com/categories/sales-gamification29

attention.com/blog-posts/top-sales-gamification-platforms28

leaderboarded.com/sales-gamification-software27

fitsmallbusiness.com/sales-gamification-software23

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/top-sales-gamification-software23

openloyalty.io/insider/best-gamification-software19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

plecto.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Plecto takes 0% of first choices and Spinify takes 31%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “sales gamification platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best sales gamification platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 590 a month (“plecto”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 6 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 7,570 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,046 · 71 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,614
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 17 of 64 in sales gamification

Segment leader

31%

Spinify

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 67 answers
Its own site cited: in 66 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on plecto.com

9,088

subdomains included

Content

1,079

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,140

Product · Integration

0 · 447

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	775	15	2026-09-21
Case study	132	undated
Comparison	81	0	2025-12-23
News or press	43	0	2025-08-04
Report or ebook	27	undated
Glossary or explainer	15	0	2026-01-29
Webinar or virtual event	3	undated
Template or tool	3	0	2025-04-14

Most recent

2026-09-21How to onboard better blog
2026-09-16Omnichannel crm blog
2026-09-15Ai sales coaching blog
2026-09-14Gen z motivation blog
2026-08-27Introvert reps blog
2026-08-24Crm truth source blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page plecto.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Plecto

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plecto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plecto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Plecto by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Plecto is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Plecto, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.