AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Pointagram · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Pointagram

47Judge labels
15First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Sales gamification for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 64 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Pointagram →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In sales gamification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Pointagram for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Sales gamificationSales10%4 of 647%14accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pointagram yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pointagram across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast10012
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained22 labels14
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative5 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pointagram stands out as the best sales gamification platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice
“Pointagram offers simple gamification starting at $5/user and features quick and easy setup” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice
“Pointagram is repeatedly flagged as the best free/low-cost sales gamification tool.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Pure Gamification (Badges & Rewards): Pointagram” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise-heavy (e.g., Centrical) or too basic (Pointagram) for mid-market scale.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales gamification · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pointagram, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pointagram was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Plecto17 of 470Not among the top eight
SmartWinnr15 of 472Not among the top eight
Zoho Motivator10 of 470Not among the top eight
Hoopla9 of 470Not among the top eight
LevelEleven8 of 470Not among the top eight
Arcade7 of 471Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pointagram. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named Pointagram and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com42
fitsmallbusiness.com34
g2.com33
kendo.ai31
attention.com28
itechguides.com25
leaderboarded.com25
techdogs.com21
spinify.com17
prospeo.io16

272 of the 272 domain citations in answers naming Pointagram came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pointagram.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pointagram takes 10% of first choices and Spinify takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sales gamification platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales gamification platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
70 a month (“pointagram”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 39 a month
Searches its site ranks for
31 · 2 in the top three
Sites linking to it
653
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
6 ads · 6 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Pointagram AB, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
10%
rank 4 of 64 in sales gamification
Segment leader
31%
Spinify
First choices
15 across its categories
Named in
47 answers
Its own site cited
in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on pointagram.com
634
subdomains included
Content
62
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 28
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog5702021-09-06CRM, Sales gamification
Webinar or virtual event4undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page pointagram.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Pointagram

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pointagram's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pointagram, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pointagram by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Pointagram is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pointagram, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pointagram.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.