AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › OneUp Sales · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

OneUp Sales

27Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Sales gamification for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 64 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of OneUp Sales →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sales gamification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OneUp Sales for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Sales gamificationSales2%6 of 640%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OneUp Sales yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OneUp Sales across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B03003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Arcade or OneUp Sales if you have fewer than 10 salespeople - they're the most cost-effective” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice
“Also highlighted as a good fit for mid-sized companies, offering comprehensive features with good value.” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales gamification · direct prompt · alternative
“Mid-sized companies will find comprehensive solutions in platforms like Ambition and OneUp Sales” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales gamification · scale prompt · alternative
“attractive if CRM-integrated leaderboards and accountability are your top priorities” Perplexity Sonar · Sales gamification · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OneUp Sales, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneUp Sales was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SmartWinnr17 of 272Not among the top eight
Plecto10 of 270Not among the top eight
LevelEleven7 of 270Not among the top eight
Zoho CRM7 of 270Not among the top eight
Zoho Motivator7 of 270Not among the top eight
Hoopla6 of 270Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneUp Sales. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named OneUp Sales and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attention.com23
techdogs.com23
g2.com21
kendo.ai20
guideflow.com19
fitsmallbusiness.com13
openloyalty.io13
gartner.com10
itechguides.com10
agilegrowthlabs.com9

No domain is on file for OneUp Sales, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where OneUp Sales stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
30 a month (“oneup sales”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 64 in sales gamification
Segment leader
31%
Spinify
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
27 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow OneUp Sales

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneUp Sales's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneUp Sales, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OneUp Sales by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where OneUp Sales is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name OneUp Sales, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.