Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 29 of 68, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedRing.io
4Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ring.io was named 3 times in Dialers, where CloudTalk led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business30 of 70
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market67 of 75
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In dialers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Ring.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales dialers and calling | Sales | 0% | 67 of 75 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by CloudTalk at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Ring.io held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Dialers · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 56 → 64 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialers | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 56 → 67 of 75 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Ring.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Ring.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Good for multi-channel sales engagement—calls plus SMS/email automation” GPT-5.4 mini · Dialers · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid premium options like ... Ring.io ($90/user/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ring.io, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ring.io was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ring.io, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ring.io was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ring.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Ring.io and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com3
ecosystem.hubspot.com2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
justcall.io2
kixie.com2
krispcall.com2
callin.io1
capterra.com1
close.com1
Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Ring.io came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ring.io
308
subdomains included
Content
202
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
47 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 186 | undated | CRM | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 3 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Case study | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ring.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (11); 0 name the category the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Ring.io
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Ring.io is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Ring.io is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sales engagement platform with parallel dialing, verified caller ID, and automatic CRM call logging for outbound sales teams.
- For
- outbound sales teams
- Price stated
- $100 more per rep. ring.io
- Starting price
- free plan for one rep ring.io
- Free plan or trial
- 21 days free on Team plans ring.io
- Integrations claimed
- 5 ring.io
- Certifications
- High Performer Winter 24Highest User Adoption Winter 24Easiest To Do Business With Winter 24Easiest Setup Winter 24Best Estimated ROI Winter 24Easiest Admin Winter 24key compliance certificationssecurity and privacy certifications
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting, customers
What Ring.io's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ring.io, ring.io/pricing, ring.io/security, ring.io/products/email. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ring.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ring.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ring.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ring.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ring.io, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.