GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › KrispCall · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

KrispCall

8Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. KrispCall was named 3 times in Dialers and 1 other category, where Aloware led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 58

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dialers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named KrispCall for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales dialers and calling	Sales	0%	24 of 76	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Aloware at 18%
Conversational intelligence and call recording	Sales	0%	41 of 93	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 52%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for KrispCall yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated KrispCall across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best ultra-budget call recording + telecom use case: KrispCall or TeleCMI — both show low entry pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Conversation intel · budget prompt · alternative

“KrispCall provides a simple and affordable sales dialing platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Dialers · budget prompt · alternative

“KrispCall is best for small businesses and startups” Llama 4 Maverick · Dialers · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as KrispCall, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KrispCall was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CloudTalk5 of 82Not in the top three

Allo3 of 81Not in the top three

PhoneBurner3 of 80Not in the top three

Aloware2 of 82Not in the top three

JustCall2 of 81Not in the top three

CallHub2 of 80Not in the top three

Chorus by ZoomInfo2 of 80Not in the top three

Gong2 of 80Not in the top three

Nooks2 of 80Not in the top three

Aircall1 of 81Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named KrispCall. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 8 answers that named KrispCall and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudtalk.io3

croclub.com3

withallo.com3

aloware.com2

hotprospector.com2

justcall.io2

kixie.com2

marketbetter.ai2

skipcall.io2

trellus.ai2

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming KrispCall came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudtalk.io/blog/dialers-for-cold-calling3

croclub.com/tools/best-sales-dialer-software3

withallo.com/blog/best-power-dialers3

aloware.com/blog/the-8-best-sales-dialers2

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-ai-sales-dialer-software2

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-auto-dialer-software-for-small-businesses2

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-power-dialer-providers2

hotprospector.com/blog/best-affordable-power-dialers2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when KrispCall's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as KrispCall, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at krispcall.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.