Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 of 38, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedReform.app
5Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reform.app was named 3 times in Consent and 1 other category, where Osano led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 40
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 52
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Reform.app for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 12 of 52 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Osano at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 109 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Reform.app held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 of 45, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 52, unchanged |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 109 of 142, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Reform.app across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Reform.app across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Osano and Reform.app are the top choices” Mistral Small · Consent · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“CookieYes and Reform.app are excellent options” Mistral Small · Consent · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reform.app, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reform.app was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reform.app, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reform.app was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reform.app. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Reform.app and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
reform.appYour site5
osano.com3
comparitech.com2
allbusinessjournal.com1
amplitude.com1
avoma.com1
bizbot.com1
cal.com1
chattermill.com1
cleverly.co1
Twelve of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Reform.app came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on reform.app
931
subdomains included
Content
792
counted in the table below
Documentation
48
Product · Integration
0 · 8
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 690 | 194 | 2026-10-06 | CRM, Enrichment | |
| Template or tool | 50 | 37 | 2026-09-30 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 47 | 46 | 2026-09-09 | CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 3 | 2026-08-12 | Enrichment | |
| Report or ebook | 2 | 2 | 2026-08-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-06Ai lead nurturing systems how they work blog
- 2026-10-06Permission errors constant contact causes blog
- 2026-10-05Glba safeguards rule saas form setup guide blog
- 2026-10-05Hubspot webhooks form submission apps blog
- 2026-10-04Constant contact duplicate contacts troubleshooting guide blog
- 2026-10-04Marketing automation kpis how to measure blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page reform.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (43); 0 name its categories the models place it in. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Reform.app
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Reform.app; a claim can dispute any of them.
Reform 1
Follow Reform.app
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Reform.app is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Reform.app is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The only conversion-focused form builder to help you maximize lead quality and quantity.
- For
- marketers
- Price stated
- Free Plan: no credit card required reform.app
- Starting price
- 0 reform.app/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Plan: no credit card required reform.app
- Integrations claimed
- 10 reform.app · 9 reform.app/integrations pages disagree
- Customers named
- Transistor.fmreel.energySavvyCalZipMessageMicroConf/TinySeedFlamingoConversion FactoryClose
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Reform.app's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: reform.app, reform.app, reform.app/pricing, reform.app/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reform.app's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reform.app, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reform.app by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Reform.app is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Reform.app, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.