Every category where a model named Recapped for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	59 of 59	50%	10	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Recapped yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Recapped across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Mutual Action Plan Leaders: Accord & Recapped” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Point solutions (Trumpet, Recapped) are fast and easy but may lack enterprise scale, rep-readiness, and deep governance.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · scale prompt · soft negative

“point solutions like Trumpet/Recapped not ideal for large governance needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales rooms · negative prompt · soft negative

“point solutions built for speed... but not suitable for enterprise scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales rooms · negative prompt · soft negative

“Other Platforms to Be Cautious About:... Recapped” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales rooms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Recapped, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Recapped was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Trumpet20 of 201Not in the top three

Seismic17 of 202Not in the top three

GetAccept14 of 202Not in the top three

Highspot14 of 202Not in the top three

MindTickle13 of 204Not in the top three

Aligned12 of 201Not in the top three

Dock11 of 201Not in the top three

DealHub9 of 200Not in the top three

Flowla8 of 200Not in the top three

Allego7 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Recapped. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 20 answers that named Recapped and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

dock.us2

federicopresicci.com2

gartner.com2

getaccept.com2

learn.g2.com2

mindtickle.com2

showpad.com2

alignedup.com1

allego.com1

arounddeal.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Recapped came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

dock.us/library/digital-sales-room-software2

gartner.com/reviews/market/digital-sales-rooms2

learn.g2.com/best-digital-sales-room-software2

mindtickle.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-platforms-comparison-and-review2

showpad.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-platforms-a-ranked-comparison-20262

alignedup.com/guides/best-deal-room-software1

allego.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-software1

allego.com/blog/digital-sales-room1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Recapped's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Recapped, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at recapped.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.