GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Rasa · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Rasa

18Judge labels
2First choices
3Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Support chatbots for enterprise buyers
Rank 29 of 106 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In support chatbots · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Rasa for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Chatbots and conversational AI for supportCustomer0%29 of 1060%4under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rasa yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rasa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Maximum control & customization: Rasa, Botpress, or Kore.ai” MiniMax M2.5 · Support chatbots · comparative prompt · alternative
“Rasa: Maximum control for open-source deployment” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Support chatbots · comparative prompt · alternative
“Teams needing complete model and data control” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Support chatbots · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rasa, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rasa was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Intercom14 of 186Not in the top three
Kore.ai13 of 182Not in the top three
Ada13 of 181Not in the top three
Botpress10 of 180Not in the top three
Tidio9 of 182Not in the top three
Zendesk AI9 of 182Not in the top three
Cognigy8 of 180Not in the top three
Salesforce Agentforce7 of 180Not in the top three
Google Dialogflow CX6 of 180Not in the top three
Amazon Lex5 of 180Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rasa. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 18 answers that named Rasa and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

botpress.com1
capterra.com1
chatty.net1
comm100.com1
crescendo.ai1
eesel.ai1
fin.ai1
g2.com1
getzowie.com1
guideflow.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Rasa came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

rasa-sdk is the company behind Rasa.
Website
rasa.com
Headquarters
San Francisco
Founded
2016

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rasa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rasa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rasa.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.