GTM AI Index

Index › Products › QorusDocs · October 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

QorusDocs

23Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

11 / 14Models named it

3Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. QorusDocs was named 7 times in RFP response and 2 other categories, where Loopio led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business28 of 68

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 82

under the label threshold

Enterprise6 of 54

under the label threshold

In rfp response · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named QorusDocs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
RFP response software	Sales	0%	21 of 82	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25%
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	60 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Proposal software	Revenue operations	0%	27 of 56	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for QorusDocs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated QorusDocs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong pick when proposal teams need repeatable authoring with controlled review routing” Muse Glimmer 30B · RFP response · comparative prompt · alternative

“QorusDocs | Microsoft-centric environments | Deep Office 365 integration” Kimi K2 · Proposals · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for Microsoft 365 Shops” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RFP response · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as QorusDocs, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QorusDocs was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Loopio21 of 235Not among the top eight

Responsive18 of 2310Not among the top eight

Upland Qvidian12 of 232Not among the top eight

PandaDoc9 of 231Not among the top eight

Proposify8 of 230Not among the top eight

AutoRFP.ai5 of 230Not among the top eight

DeepRFP4 of 232Not among the top eight

Arphie3 of 230Not among the top eight

GetAccept3 of 230Not among the top eight

Inventive AI3 of 230Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QorusDocs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 23 answers that named QorusDocs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

inventive.ai16

responsive.io15

loopio.com13

g2.com12

sifthub.io11

guideflow.com10

bidsparq.com9

autogenai.com7

autorfp.ai7

getaccept.com7

107 of the 107 domain citations in answers naming QorusDocs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bidsparq.com/blog/rfp-management-software9

guideflow.com/blog/rfp-software9

inventive.ai/blog-posts/best-rfp-software8

responsive.io/blog/best-rfp-software8

qorusdocs.com/compare7

responsive.io/blog/best-proposal-software-comparison7

wifitalents.com/best/rfp-response-software6

flowcase.com/blog/top-proposal-management-solutions-for-enterprise-12-solutions-compared5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on qorusdocs.com

356

subdomains included

Content

316

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	181	9	2026-09-14	Proposals
News or press	43	0	2026-06-30	Proposals
Report or ebook	32	2	2026-09-11
Case study	23	0	2026-05-04
Podcast or video	16	2	2026-08-24
Webinar or virtual event	6	0	2026-03-12
Comparison	6	1	2026-08-17	Proposals
Glossary or explainer	5	1	2026-08-31
Template or tool	3	0	2026-06-08
Conference or event	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-14Qorusdocs vs. responsive which proposal platform is right for your team blog
2026-09-11The connected pitch how law firms are winning more repeat business report or ebook
2026-09-08Ai proposal management workflows 5 practical ways to use ai in proposals blog
2026-08-31What is agentic ai for proposal management glossary or explainer
2026-08-24How law firms can use ai in business development blog
2026-08-24How to use ai in proposal management 5 practical workflows podcast or video

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page qorusdocs.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow QorusDocs

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

QorusDocs is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-Powered Proposal Management Software
qorusdocs.com
For: Built for professional services teams
qorusdocs.com
Price stated: QorusDocs pricing is not published on the website qorusdocs.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: QorusDocs does not offer a self-serve free trial qorusdocs.com/pricing
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIGDPRGDPR compliance
Customers named: WSP
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting

What QorusDocs's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: qorusdocs.com, qorusdocs.com/pricing, qorusdocs.com/compliance, qorusdocs.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QorusDocs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QorusDocs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for QorusDocs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where QorusDocs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name QorusDocs, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.