Every category where a model named Qlik for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Dashboards and data visualization	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	13 of 73	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qlik yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qlik across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Qlik is superior for organizations that want to avoid vendor lock-in, require complex data integration from diverse, multi-cloud sources” Claude Haiku 4.5 · BI & dashboards · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qlik, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qlik was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tableau29 of 314Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI25 of 3114Not in the top three

Looker24 of 310Not in the top three

Domo13 of 310Not in the top three

Metabase11 of 311Not in the top three

ThoughtSpot10 of 310Not in the top three

Sigma8 of 310Not in the top three

Zoho Analytics7 of 314Not in the top three

Looker Studio7 of 312Not in the top three

Sisense6 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qlik. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 31 answers that named Qlik and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qlik.comYour site6

toolradar.com5

domo.com4

improvado.io4

monday.com4

ovaledge.com4

reddit.com4

gartner.com3

fastero.com2

holistics.io2

Thirty-two of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Qlik came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

monday.com/blog/project-management/bi-tools4

ovaledge.com/blog/business-intelligence-tools4

qlik.com/us/business-intelligence/business-intelligence-tools4

toolradar.com/guides/best-business-intelligence-tools4

improvado.io/blog/enterprise-business-intelligence-software-solutions3

qlik.com/us/business-intelligence-tools3

domo.com/learn/article/business-intelligence-tools2

gartner.com/en/documents/65766022

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Qlik.

Website: qlik.com
Headquarters: King of Prussia, United States
Founded: 1993
Ownership: Public, QLIK on Nasdaq

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qlik's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qlik, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qlik.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.