GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › PR Newswire · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

PR Newswire

11Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PR Newswire was named 2 times in PR, where Muck Rack led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business60 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market63 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprise15 of 42

under the label threshold

In pr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PR Newswire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
PR and media monitoring	Marketing	0%	63 of 65	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Muck Rack at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PR Newswire yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PR Newswire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Good for press releases but less robust for ongoing monitoring” Mistral Small · PR · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“CAUTION (specifically for pricing)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PR Newswire, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PR Newswire was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cision11 of 111Not in the top three

Meltwater11 of 111Not in the top three

Muck Rack9 of 114Not in the top three

Brand245 of 112Not in the top three

Semrush AI PR Toolkit5 of 111Not in the top three

Business Wire5 of 110Not in the top three

Brandwatch4 of 110Not in the top three

Mention4 of 110Not in the top three

Awario3 of 110Not in the top three

Onclusive3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Names read as PR Newswire

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PR Newswire; a claim can dispute any of them.

PR Newswire/PRWeb 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PR Newswire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PR Newswire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at prnews.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.