AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Planview · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Planview

6Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Planview was named 3 times in Marketing resource mgt, where Wrike for Marketing led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In marketing resource mgt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Planview for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Marketing resource managementMarketing2%15 of 1100%3under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Planview yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Planview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend requesting demos from Opal, Aprimo, and Planview as they're specifically built for enterprise-scale marketing operations.” MiniMax M2.5 · Marketing resource mgt · scale prompt · first choice
“Teams that need portfolio-level governance and capacity planning across Marketing, Product, IT and HR pick Planview.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strong for governance-grade routing and portfolio priorities” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Planview, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Planview was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Aprimo5 of 61Not among the top eight
Screendragon4 of 60Not among the top eight
Wrike for Marketing4 of 60Not among the top eight
Adobe Workfront3 of 60Not among the top eight
Kantata3 of 60Not among the top eight
Resource Guru3 of 60Not among the top eight
monday.com Work Management2 of 61Not among the top eight
IntelligenceBank2 of 60Not among the top eight
Smartsheet2 of 60Not among the top eight
Widen2 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Planview. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Planview and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com6
gitnux.org5
capterra.com4
g2.com4
clickup.com3
getapp.com3
guideflow.com3
opentext.com3
teamwork.com3
thecmo.com3

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Planview came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

planview.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Planview takes 2% of first choices and Wrike for Marketing takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “marketing resource management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing resource management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 126,803 a month
Searches its site ranks for
13,791 · 955 in the top three
Sites linking to it
8,365
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 0 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 86 text, 34 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Planview, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 28 in the year, 92 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 110 in marketing resource mgt
Segment leader
24%
Wrike for Marketing
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on planview.com
7,488
subdomains included
Content
4,295
counted in the table below
Documentation
879
Product · Integration
298 · 104
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog3,34972026-09-24
News or press34702021-11-03
Report or ebook28302025-11-20
Conference or event9802025-03-26
Glossary or explainer6802026-05-14
Comparison6502026-03-24
Webinar or virtual event5402026-06-09
Case study19undated
Template or tool902026-03-02
Podcast or video3undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page planview.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Planview

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Planview is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Strategic Portfolio Management & Software Delivery Solutions
For
EPMOs, PMOs, transformation offices, research and development teams, software delivery teams, and the Office of the CFO
Free plan or trial
Demos & Free Trials planview.com
Integrations claimed
60 planview.com
Certifications
CSA STARGDPRISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27701SOC 2Recognized by Gartner, Forrester, and IDC
Hosting
USEU
Customers named
Santanderco-opFedExVolvoNatWestAccentureUPS
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price

What Planview's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: planview.com, trust.planview.com, planview.com/platform/ai, planview.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Planview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Planview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Planview by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Planview is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Planview, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at planview.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.