GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Personizely · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Personizely

16Judge labels

4First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Personizely was named 5 times in Experimentation, where VWO led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business11 of 91

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 69

under the label threshold

Enterprise35 of 53

under the label threshold

In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Personizely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Experimentation and personalization	Marketing	6%	7 of 69	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by VWO at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Personizely yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Personizely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best website experimentation and personalization platform for a mid-market B2B company is likely to be Personizely, Personyze, or VWO” Llama 4 Maverick · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice

“Personizely ($31/month) if you need actual personalization features” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with Personyze or Personizely” MiniMax M2.5 · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice

“Personizely is the most practical option for businesses that don't want to pay enterprise prices or manage multiple tools” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Experimentation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Personizely, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Personizely was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Optimizely CMS12 of 161Not in the top three

VWO11 of 162Not in the top three

GrowthBook6 of 162Not in the top three

Mida6 of 162Not in the top three

Dynamic Yield6 of 161Not in the top three

Kameleoon6 of 161Not in the top three

Adobe Target6 of 160Not in the top three

Statsig6 of 160Not in the top three

PostHog5 of 162Not in the top three

AB Tasty5 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Personizely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 16 answers that named Personizely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com2

maestra.io2

mida.so2

personizely.netYour site2

scandiweb.com2

vwo.com2

cience.com1

webfx.com1

webyking.com1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Personizely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-personalization-software2

maestra.io/blog/comparisons/best-website-personalization-tools-ecommerce2

maestra.io/blog/comparisons/ecommerce-personalization-tools-guide2

mida.so/blog/website-personalization-tools2

scandiweb.com/blog/top-9-website-personalization-tools2

vwo.com/blog/web-personalization-tools2

cience.com/tools/website-personalization1

personizely.net/blog/ab-testing-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Personizely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Personizely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at personizely.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.